Evaluation of toxin neutralisation in test systems for diphtheria antibody assessment.

Abstract

Over the past years, various authors have reported that the amount of toxin used in toxin neutralisation (TN) assays for diphtheria appears to influence the resulting relative antibody titre. Antibody affinity is thought to be an influencing factor. To confirm this observation and study the underlying mechanism of toxin neutralisation, a panel of sera was generated, differing in species of origin (mouse, guinea pig, and rabbit) and in affinity by using different immunisation schedules. The panel was then tested in relevant TN test systems for diphtheria antibody titration, namely the VERO cell test, the Toxin Binding Inhibition (ToBI) assay and the in vivo skin test in guinea pigs. A hyperimmune equine reference serum was used as the standard. Antibody affinity was measured in two different affinity ELISAs, the ammonium thiocyanate elution ELISA and the diethylamine inhibition ELISA. The VERO cell test clearly demonstrates the phenomenon; the higher the toxin dose used in the assay, the higher the resulting relative potency. The difference in relative antibody titre decreases as antibody affinity increases. This is especially evident when an equine hyperimmune reference serum is used as the standard. When a species homologous reference is used, the phenomenon is less distinct. The ToBI test, however, does not show the phenomenon. This discrepancy between these two test systems is being further investigated, and comparison will be made with the in vivo TN test. The findings confirm and support earlier observations. It is still unclear exactly which mechanisms are involved in the toxin neutralisation process. Antibody subclasses and class switching could play a role and will be further studied.