Influence of renal replacement therapy on outcome of patients with acute renal failure.

Kidney international. Supplement Pub Date : 1999-11-01
S Kresse, H Schlee, H J Deuber, W Koall, B Osten
{"title":"Influence of renal replacement therapy on outcome of patients with acute renal failure.","authors":"S Kresse,&nbsp;H Schlee,&nbsp;H J Deuber,&nbsp;W Koall,&nbsp;B Osten","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are many controversial results about the influence of acute renal failure (ARF) and renal replacement therapy (RRT) on patient outcome in intensive care units. This retrospective study compared demographics. severity, course, and prognosis of ARF during 36 months (period 1, 1991 through 1993; 128 cases) and 18 months (period 2, 1994 through 1995; 141 cases). Compared with period 1, during period 2 there was a markedly increased incidence of ARF. There were no significant differences in patient demographics or etiology of renal failure, but the therapeutic approach to ARF was quite different. During period 2, RRT was started at earlier stages of renal insufficiency (that is, less elevated creatinine serum concentrations or reduced diuresis). Additionally, there was a significant increase in the numbers of continuous RRT (CRRT) replacing the discontinuous mode of dialysis treatment. Compared with period 1, mortality was reduced from 78.9 to 59.6% during period 2 (P < 0.001). There were no differences in mortality between the patients from internal and surgical wards. Mortality in patients treated with CRRT was in period 1 and in period 2 higher than mortality in patients treated with intermittent RRT, but these results are biased by a preferred use of CRRT in severely ill patients with an unstable circulatory system. These data suggest that the early onset of RRT reduces the mortality of intensive care unit patients with ARF independent of underlying diseases. An influence of the method of RRT, sex, and age on outcome of patients with ARF could not be proven.</p>","PeriodicalId":17704,"journal":{"name":"Kidney international. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney international. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are many controversial results about the influence of acute renal failure (ARF) and renal replacement therapy (RRT) on patient outcome in intensive care units. This retrospective study compared demographics. severity, course, and prognosis of ARF during 36 months (period 1, 1991 through 1993; 128 cases) and 18 months (period 2, 1994 through 1995; 141 cases). Compared with period 1, during period 2 there was a markedly increased incidence of ARF. There were no significant differences in patient demographics or etiology of renal failure, but the therapeutic approach to ARF was quite different. During period 2, RRT was started at earlier stages of renal insufficiency (that is, less elevated creatinine serum concentrations or reduced diuresis). Additionally, there was a significant increase in the numbers of continuous RRT (CRRT) replacing the discontinuous mode of dialysis treatment. Compared with period 1, mortality was reduced from 78.9 to 59.6% during period 2 (P < 0.001). There were no differences in mortality between the patients from internal and surgical wards. Mortality in patients treated with CRRT was in period 1 and in period 2 higher than mortality in patients treated with intermittent RRT, but these results are biased by a preferred use of CRRT in severely ill patients with an unstable circulatory system. These data suggest that the early onset of RRT reduces the mortality of intensive care unit patients with ARF independent of underlying diseases. An influence of the method of RRT, sex, and age on outcome of patients with ARF could not be proven.

肾替代治疗对急性肾功能衰竭患者预后的影响。
急性肾功能衰竭(ARF)和肾脏替代治疗(RRT)对重症监护病房患者预后的影响存在许多有争议的结果。这项回顾性研究比较了人口统计学。36个月内ARF的严重程度、病程和预后(1991年至1993年第1期;128例)和18个月(1994年至1995年第2期;141例)。与第1期相比,第2期ARF发生率明显增高。患者人口统计学和肾衰竭的病因学没有显著差异,但治疗ARF的方法却有很大不同。在第2阶段,RRT开始于肾功能不全的早期阶段(即血清肌酐浓度升高较少或利尿减少)。此外,连续RRT (CRRT)的数量显著增加,取代了不连续的透析治疗模式。与第1期相比,第2期死亡率从78.9降至59.6% (P < 0.001)。内科病房与外科病房患者的死亡率无差异。接受CRRT治疗的患者在第1期和第2期的死亡率高于接受间歇性RRT治疗的患者,但这些结果因循环系统不稳定的重症患者优先使用CRRT而存在偏差。这些数据表明,早发性RRT可降低重症监护病房ARF患者的死亡率,而不依赖于基础疾病。RRT方法、性别和年龄对ARF患者预后的影响尚未得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信