The on-eye dehydration of proclear compatibles lenses.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the on-eye dehydration over time, of molded omafilcon A lenses (Proclear Compatibles) compared to a range of frequent replacement lenses.

Methods: Ten subjects wore a Proclear Compatibles lens in one eye and a control lens in the other eye for 4-, 8- and 12-hours. The control lenses were Acuvue, Soflens 66 and Optima frequent replacement lenses. Each subject wore three different pairs of lenses for each time period in a masked, randomized fashion. A gravimetric technique was used to determine lens water content.

Results: The Proclear Compatibles lenses showed significantly less relative dehydration than the Acuvue and Soflens 66 lenses. The Acuvue and Soflens 66 lenses showed a significant increase in relative dehydration with increasing wearing time. Subjective comfort was graded higher with the Proclear Compatibles than with the Acuvue lenses. There was a significant negative correlation between Acuvue dehydration and subjective ratings of comfort.

Conclusions: The study showed that Proclear Compatibles lenses dehydrate significantly less than the other frequent replacement high-water content lenses. The Acuvue and Soflens 66 lenses showed increasing dehydration during the 4-12 hour wearing period.