Microbiological evaluation of contact lenses and contact lens disinfection solutions in an asymptomatic population and in medical personnel.

L Közer-Bilgin, N Demir, R Altan-Yaycioglu
{"title":"Microbiological evaluation of contact lenses and contact lens disinfection solutions in an asymptomatic population and in medical personnel.","authors":"L Közer-Bilgin,&nbsp;N Demir,&nbsp;R Altan-Yaycioglu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the contamination of contact lenses and contact lens disinfection solutions in a population of contact lenses wearers comprised of medical personnel and non-medical subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-six medical personnel working in an infectious environment and 35 non-medical subjects were enrolled in the study. Contact lenses and contact lens disinfecting solutions were cultured and potential pathogens were isolated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The frequency of isolation of pathogens from the contact lenses of medical personnel was significantly higher than from non-medical subjects. There was no growth in both the contact lens and the disinfecting solution cultures in 56.5% of the subjects in the medical personnel group, and in 57.1% of non-medical group of subjects. Both the contact lens and disinfecting solution cultures were positive in 21.7% of the medical personnel group, while in the non-medical group, only 2.9% of subjects had positive cultures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Microbacterial contamination of contact lenses and disinfection solution was more frequent in the medical personnel group compared with non-medical subjects. In the medical personnel group, the most frequently isolated microorganism was Staphylococcus albus (19.8%), which is seen in hospital infections. Because soft and rigid gas permeable contact lens usage was approximately equal, we conclude that medical personnel are more prone to contamination.</p>","PeriodicalId":22367,"journal":{"name":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","volume":"25 4","pages":"228-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the contamination of contact lenses and contact lens disinfection solutions in a population of contact lenses wearers comprised of medical personnel and non-medical subjects.

Methods: Forty-six medical personnel working in an infectious environment and 35 non-medical subjects were enrolled in the study. Contact lenses and contact lens disinfecting solutions were cultured and potential pathogens were isolated.

Results: The frequency of isolation of pathogens from the contact lenses of medical personnel was significantly higher than from non-medical subjects. There was no growth in both the contact lens and the disinfecting solution cultures in 56.5% of the subjects in the medical personnel group, and in 57.1% of non-medical group of subjects. Both the contact lens and disinfecting solution cultures were positive in 21.7% of the medical personnel group, while in the non-medical group, only 2.9% of subjects had positive cultures.

Conclusions: Microbacterial contamination of contact lenses and disinfection solution was more frequent in the medical personnel group compared with non-medical subjects. In the medical personnel group, the most frequently isolated microorganism was Staphylococcus albus (19.8%), which is seen in hospital infections. Because soft and rigid gas permeable contact lens usage was approximately equal, we conclude that medical personnel are more prone to contamination.

隐形眼镜和隐形眼镜消毒液在无症状人群和医务人员中的微生物评价。
目的:比较医务人员和非医务人员佩戴隐形眼镜人群中隐形眼镜和隐形眼镜消毒液的污染情况。方法:选取46名在感染性环境中工作的医务人员和35名非医务人员作为研究对象。培养隐形眼镜和隐形眼镜消毒液,分离潜在病原体。结果:医务人员隐形眼镜检出致病菌的频率明显高于非医务人员。56.5%医务人员组和57.1%非医务人员组的隐形眼镜和消毒液培养物均无生长。医务人员组隐形眼镜和消毒液培养均为阳性的比例为21.7%,而非医务人员组培养阳性率仅为2.9%。结论:医务人员组隐形眼镜及消毒液的微生物污染较非医务人员组多。在医务人员组中,最常见的分离微生物是白色葡萄球菌(19.8%),见于医院感染。由于软性透气性隐形眼镜和硬性透气性隐形眼镜的使用大致相等,我们得出结论,医务人员更容易受到污染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信