Characterization of bacteria isolated from wild legumes in the north-western regions of China.

Z Y Tan, E T Wang, G X Peng, M E Zhu, E Martínez-Romero, W X Chen
{"title":"Characterization of bacteria isolated from wild legumes in the north-western regions of China.","authors":"Z Y Tan,&nbsp;E T Wang,&nbsp;G X Peng,&nbsp;M E Zhu,&nbsp;E Martínez-Romero,&nbsp;W X Chen","doi":"10.1099/00207713-49-4-1457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nodule isolates from 11 species of wild legumes in north-western China were characterized by numerical taxonomy, PCR-based 16S rRNA gene RFLP and sequence analyses, DNA-DNA hybridization, restriction patterns of nodDAB and nifH genes, and symbiotic properties. Based on the results of numerical taxonomy, most of the 35 new isolates were grouped into five clusters (clusters 7, 9, 12, 14 and 15). Clusters 7 and 12 were identified as Mesorhizobium amorphae and Agrobacterium tumefaciens, respectively, based on their high DNA homologies with the reference strains for these species, their 16S rRNA gene analysis and their phenotypic features. Results of 16S rDNA PCR-RFLP analysis showed that cluster 9 belonged to Rhizobium. Clusters 14 and 15 were identified as Mesorhizobium based on their moderately slow-growing, acid-producing characters and the high similarity of their 16S rDNA PCR-RFLP patterns to those of Mesorhizobium species. These two clusters were genomic species distinct from all described species based on analysis of DNA relatedness within this genus. The isolates in cluster 12 (Agrobacterium tumefaciens) failed to nodulate their original host and other selected hosts and they did not hybridize to nif or nod gene probes. The possibility of opportunistic nodulation of these isolates is discussed. Identical restriction patterns were obtained in the nif or nod gene hybridization studies from the three isolates within cluster 15, which were isolated from the same host species. The isolates from different host plants in each of clusters 9 and 14 produced different nodDAB RFLP patterns, but similar nifH RFLP patterns appeared (one band for each isolate). Different patterns were observed among different clusters from both the nod and nif gene hybridization studies. Crossnodulation was recorded among the isolates and the host plants in the same cluster and promiscuous properties were found among some of the hosts tested.</p>","PeriodicalId":14428,"journal":{"name":"International journal of systematic bacteriology","volume":"49 Pt 4 ","pages":"1457-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1099/00207713-49-4-1457","citationCount":"59","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of systematic bacteriology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-49-4-1457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 59

Abstract

Nodule isolates from 11 species of wild legumes in north-western China were characterized by numerical taxonomy, PCR-based 16S rRNA gene RFLP and sequence analyses, DNA-DNA hybridization, restriction patterns of nodDAB and nifH genes, and symbiotic properties. Based on the results of numerical taxonomy, most of the 35 new isolates were grouped into five clusters (clusters 7, 9, 12, 14 and 15). Clusters 7 and 12 were identified as Mesorhizobium amorphae and Agrobacterium tumefaciens, respectively, based on their high DNA homologies with the reference strains for these species, their 16S rRNA gene analysis and their phenotypic features. Results of 16S rDNA PCR-RFLP analysis showed that cluster 9 belonged to Rhizobium. Clusters 14 and 15 were identified as Mesorhizobium based on their moderately slow-growing, acid-producing characters and the high similarity of their 16S rDNA PCR-RFLP patterns to those of Mesorhizobium species. These two clusters were genomic species distinct from all described species based on analysis of DNA relatedness within this genus. The isolates in cluster 12 (Agrobacterium tumefaciens) failed to nodulate their original host and other selected hosts and they did not hybridize to nif or nod gene probes. The possibility of opportunistic nodulation of these isolates is discussed. Identical restriction patterns were obtained in the nif or nod gene hybridization studies from the three isolates within cluster 15, which were isolated from the same host species. The isolates from different host plants in each of clusters 9 and 14 produced different nodDAB RFLP patterns, but similar nifH RFLP patterns appeared (one band for each isolate). Different patterns were observed among different clusters from both the nod and nif gene hybridization studies. Crossnodulation was recorded among the isolates and the host plants in the same cluster and promiscuous properties were found among some of the hosts tested.

中国西北地区野生豆科植物分离细菌的鉴定。
对西北地区11种野生豆科植物的结核分离物进行了数量分类、16S rRNA基因RFLP和序列分析、DNA-DNA杂交、nodDAB和nifH基因的酶切模式和共生特性分析。根据数值分类结果,35个新分离株大部分可分为5个聚类(聚类7、9、12、14和15)。基于与参比菌株DNA高度同源性、16S rRNA基因分析和表型特征,鉴定聚类7和聚类12分别为定形中根菌和农杆菌。16S rDNA PCR-RFLP分析结果表明,第9簇属根瘤菌。根据其生长缓慢、产酸的特性,以及其16S rDNA PCR-RFLP模式与中根瘤菌高度相似,鉴定为中根瘤菌。这两个簇是基于该属内DNA亲缘性分析的不同于所有描述物种的基因组物种。第12簇农杆菌(Agrobacterium tumefaciens)的分离株不能结瘤其原始宿主和其他选定的宿主,也不能与nif或nod基因探针杂交。讨论了这些分离株机会性结瘤的可能性。聚类15中3株分离物的nif或nod基因杂交结果均为相同的限制性内切型。不同寄主植物的菌株在第9和第14群中产生不同的nodDAB RFLP模式,但出现相似的nifH RFLP模式(每个菌株都有一个条带)。在nod和nif基因杂交研究中,不同的簇之间观察到不同的模式。分离株与同一簇的寄主植物存在交调现象,部分寄主之间存在混交现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信