Identification of SCA2 mutation in cases of spinocerebellar ataxia with no family history in mid-eastern Sicily.

S Giuffrida, R Saponara, A Trovato Salinaro, D A Restivo, E Domina, M Papotto, F Le Pira, A Nicoletti, A Trovato, D F Condorelli
{"title":"Identification of SCA2 mutation in cases of spinocerebellar ataxia with no family history in mid-eastern Sicily.","authors":"S Giuffrida,&nbsp;R Saponara,&nbsp;A Trovato Salinaro,&nbsp;D A Restivo,&nbsp;E Domina,&nbsp;M Papotto,&nbsp;F Le Pira,&nbsp;A Nicoletti,&nbsp;A Trovato,&nbsp;D F Condorelli","doi":"10.1007/s100720050034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Differential diagnosis between autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia type I (ADCA I) and idiopathic cerebellar ataxia type P (IDCA-P) is very difficult given only clinical and neuroradiological data. The only certain distinctive characteristic is the presence or absence of family history. We observed 7 patients with late-onset cerebellar ataxia associated with other non-cerebellar signs and without a family history of the disease in which clinical signs were comparable to symptoms found in SCA2. The neuroradiological study showed olivopontocerebellar atrophy in all patients and the presence of hyperintensity of the transverse pontine fibers in 6 patients (85. 6%); molecular analysis showed SCA2 mutations in 2 patients. We also report the case of a patient who was initially considered as IDCA-P but who was later correctly identified as SCA2 with an atypical family history (false IDCA-P), after a genetic mutation was found and following an interview with the mother. Our data suggest that spinocerebellar ataxia syndrome should be defined as idiopathic not only after having excluded the possible symptomatic causes but also in the absence of family history, after having excluded the presence of genetic mutation. We believe that family history, in late-onset spinocerebellar ataxia, cannot be considered as the differential criterion among hereditary (ADCA-I) and non-hereditary (IDCA-P) forms; molecular analysis is required for a correct diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":73522,"journal":{"name":"Italian journal of neurological sciences","volume":"20 4","pages":"217-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s100720050034","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian journal of neurological sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s100720050034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Differential diagnosis between autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia type I (ADCA I) and idiopathic cerebellar ataxia type P (IDCA-P) is very difficult given only clinical and neuroradiological data. The only certain distinctive characteristic is the presence or absence of family history. We observed 7 patients with late-onset cerebellar ataxia associated with other non-cerebellar signs and without a family history of the disease in which clinical signs were comparable to symptoms found in SCA2. The neuroradiological study showed olivopontocerebellar atrophy in all patients and the presence of hyperintensity of the transverse pontine fibers in 6 patients (85. 6%); molecular analysis showed SCA2 mutations in 2 patients. We also report the case of a patient who was initially considered as IDCA-P but who was later correctly identified as SCA2 with an atypical family history (false IDCA-P), after a genetic mutation was found and following an interview with the mother. Our data suggest that spinocerebellar ataxia syndrome should be defined as idiopathic not only after having excluded the possible symptomatic causes but also in the absence of family history, after having excluded the presence of genetic mutation. We believe that family history, in late-onset spinocerebellar ataxia, cannot be considered as the differential criterion among hereditary (ADCA-I) and non-hereditary (IDCA-P) forms; molecular analysis is required for a correct diagnosis.

西西里岛中东部无家族史脊髓小脑性共济失调患者SCA2突变的鉴定
常染色体显性小脑性共济失调I型(ADCA I)和特发性小脑性共济失调P型(IDCA-P)的鉴别诊断非常困难,仅根据临床和神经影像学资料。唯一明显的特征是有没有家族史。我们观察了7例伴有其他非小脑症状的迟发性小脑性共济失调患者,且无该病家族史,其临床症状与SCA2的症状相当。神经放射学研究显示所有患者的橄榄桥脑小脑萎缩,6例患者的桥脑横断纤维存在高强度。6%);分子分析显示2例患者出现SCA2突变。我们还报告了一例最初被认为是IDCA-P的患者,但后来被正确地鉴定为SCA2,具有非典型家族史(假IDCA-P),在发现基因突变并与母亲面谈后。我们的数据表明,脊髓小脑共济失调综合征应被定义为特发性,不仅在排除可能的症状原因后,而且在没有家族史的情况下,在排除基因突变的存在后。我们认为,迟发性脊髓小脑性共济失调的家族史不能作为遗传性(adca - 1)和非遗传性(IDCA-P)形式的鉴别标准;正确诊断需要分子分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信