Methods for early identification of noise-induced hearing loss.

A J Hall, M E Lutman
{"title":"Methods for early identification of noise-induced hearing loss.","authors":"A J Hall,&nbsp;M E Lutman","doi":"10.3109/00206099909073035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An ideal test for identifying shifts in cochlear function would be highly repeatable and sensitive to minor damage. Three types of otoacoustic emission (OAE) test and pure-tone audiometry were evaluated for this purpose. They were compared in terms of test-retest repeatability within subjects and sensitivity to differences between subjects. The OAE measures were transiently evoked either conventionally (TEOAE) or using maximum length sequences (TEOAE-MLS), or continuously evoked as distortion products (DPOAEs). Several stimulus conditions were evaluated for each type. Thirty eight subjects with normal hearing or mild hearing losses were tested on all measures. Test-retest repeatability was rescaled according to the sensitivity of each measure to differences in hearing threshold level, thus allowing a direct comparison across methods. The most repeatable method thus defined was TEOAE-MLS which gave a rescaled standard deviation of 1.8 dB on replication. This was followed by TEOAE and DPOAE which gave rescaled standard deviations of 2.9 and 3.1 dB, respectively. All were more reliable than pure-tone audiometry which had a standard deviation of 4.9 dB. It is concluded that the various OAE measures have the potential to distinguish small changes in cochlear function from measurement uncertainty, and hence show promise for monitoring cochlear function in ears exposed to noise or other hazards.</p>","PeriodicalId":75571,"journal":{"name":"Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology","volume":"38 5","pages":"277-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00206099909073035","citationCount":"79","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/00206099909073035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 79

Abstract

An ideal test for identifying shifts in cochlear function would be highly repeatable and sensitive to minor damage. Three types of otoacoustic emission (OAE) test and pure-tone audiometry were evaluated for this purpose. They were compared in terms of test-retest repeatability within subjects and sensitivity to differences between subjects. The OAE measures were transiently evoked either conventionally (TEOAE) or using maximum length sequences (TEOAE-MLS), or continuously evoked as distortion products (DPOAEs). Several stimulus conditions were evaluated for each type. Thirty eight subjects with normal hearing or mild hearing losses were tested on all measures. Test-retest repeatability was rescaled according to the sensitivity of each measure to differences in hearing threshold level, thus allowing a direct comparison across methods. The most repeatable method thus defined was TEOAE-MLS which gave a rescaled standard deviation of 1.8 dB on replication. This was followed by TEOAE and DPOAE which gave rescaled standard deviations of 2.9 and 3.1 dB, respectively. All were more reliable than pure-tone audiometry which had a standard deviation of 4.9 dB. It is concluded that the various OAE measures have the potential to distinguish small changes in cochlear function from measurement uncertainty, and hence show promise for monitoring cochlear function in ears exposed to noise or other hazards.

噪声性听力损失的早期识别方法。
识别耳蜗功能变化的理想测试应该是高度可重复且对轻微损伤敏感的。为此目的对三种类型的耳声发射(OAE)测试和纯音听力学进行了评估。他们在受试者内的测试-重测重复性和受试者之间差异的敏感性方面进行了比较。OAE测量被瞬时激发,要么是常规(TEOAE),要么是使用最大长度序列(TEOAE- mls),要么是作为失真产物(dpoae)被连续激发。对每种类型的几种刺激条件进行了评估。38名听力正常或轻度听力损失的受试者进行了各项测试。根据每个测量对听力阈值水平差异的敏感性,重新调整测试-重测重复性,从而允许跨方法进行直接比较。因此定义的重复性最好的方法是TEOAE-MLS,该方法在复制时的标度标准差为1.8 dB。其次是TEOAE和DPOAE,分别给出了2.9和3.1 dB的标度标准差。所有这些都比纯音测听更可靠,纯音测听的标准偏差为4.9 dB。综上所述,各种声发射测量方法有可能从测量不确定性中区分耳蜗功能的微小变化,因此有望监测暴露于噪声或其他危害的耳朵的耳蜗功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信