Prevention of cardioembolic stroke: use of oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation.

G D'Alessandro, G Corso, E Bottacchi, M Pesenti Campagnoni, G Silvestri, C Polillo, M De Marchi, G Begliuomini, L Iannizzi, L Roveyaz
{"title":"Prevention of cardioembolic stroke: use of oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation.","authors":"G D'Alessandro,&nbsp;G Corso,&nbsp;E Bottacchi,&nbsp;M Pesenti Campagnoni,&nbsp;G Silvestri,&nbsp;C Polillo,&nbsp;M De Marchi,&nbsp;G Begliuomini,&nbsp;L Iannizzi,&nbsp;L Roveyaz","doi":"10.1007/s100720050027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the aim of quantifying the use of oral anticoagulant (OA) therapy in clinical practice, we surveyed 150 consecutive patients admitted with a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF). Each patient was administered a questionnaire relating to the classic vascular risk factors and to the antithrombotic treatment received at home. The diagnosis of AF was formulated at the time of admission in 45 cases. Of the 105 cases with a previous diagnosis, OA therapy was relatively or absolutely contraindicated in 21 patients (20%), whereas the other 84 (80%) were ideal candidates for the treatment. Of these, 20 (24%) were actually receiving OA, 16 (19%) were on platelet anti-aggregants (PA), and 48 (57%) were receiving no antithrombotic treatment at all. Even lower percentages of OA use were found in the patients with a previous (20%) or recent (16%) history of cerebral ischemia. Upon discharge, of the 115 patients without contraindications to OA (84 with previously known and 31 with newly diagnosed AF), 50% were receiving OA and 20% PA. The results of this survey show that OA therapy is little used in the Valle d'Aosta Region for the prevention of ischemic stroke in AF patients at high risk for cerebral ischemia. The lack of knowledge among the general population, the difficulty of initiating the therapy in patients such as ours with severe comorbidities, and the absence of disorganization of centers for OA monitoring may be the main reasons underlying this low level of use. Population screening or a sensitization campaign could increase the identification of subjects at risk, whereas better organization of coagulation monitoring centers could encourage OA use in subjects at high risk for cerebral ischemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":73522,"journal":{"name":"Italian journal of neurological sciences","volume":"20 3","pages":"167-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s100720050027","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian journal of neurological sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s100720050027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the aim of quantifying the use of oral anticoagulant (OA) therapy in clinical practice, we surveyed 150 consecutive patients admitted with a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF). Each patient was administered a questionnaire relating to the classic vascular risk factors and to the antithrombotic treatment received at home. The diagnosis of AF was formulated at the time of admission in 45 cases. Of the 105 cases with a previous diagnosis, OA therapy was relatively or absolutely contraindicated in 21 patients (20%), whereas the other 84 (80%) were ideal candidates for the treatment. Of these, 20 (24%) were actually receiving OA, 16 (19%) were on platelet anti-aggregants (PA), and 48 (57%) were receiving no antithrombotic treatment at all. Even lower percentages of OA use were found in the patients with a previous (20%) or recent (16%) history of cerebral ischemia. Upon discharge, of the 115 patients without contraindications to OA (84 with previously known and 31 with newly diagnosed AF), 50% were receiving OA and 20% PA. The results of this survey show that OA therapy is little used in the Valle d'Aosta Region for the prevention of ischemic stroke in AF patients at high risk for cerebral ischemia. The lack of knowledge among the general population, the difficulty of initiating the therapy in patients such as ours with severe comorbidities, and the absence of disorganization of centers for OA monitoring may be the main reasons underlying this low level of use. Population screening or a sensitization campaign could increase the identification of subjects at risk, whereas better organization of coagulation monitoring centers could encourage OA use in subjects at high risk for cerebral ischemia.

预防心源性卒中:心房颤动患者口服抗凝剂的应用。
为了量化口服抗凝剂(OA)治疗在临床实践中的应用,我们调查了150名连续确诊为房颤(AF)的患者。每位患者都接受了一份关于典型血管危险因素和在家接受抗血栓治疗的问卷调查。45例患者在入院时确定房颤的诊断。在105例既往诊断的病例中,21例(20%)患者的OA治疗是相对或绝对禁忌症,而其他84例(80%)患者是治疗的理想候选者。其中,20人(24%)实际接受OA治疗,16人(19%)接受血小板抗聚集剂(PA)治疗,48人(57%)根本没有接受抗血栓治疗。有脑缺血史(20%)或近期有脑缺血史(16%)的患者使用OA的比例更低。出院时,115例无OA禁忌症的患者(84例已知AF, 31例新诊断AF), 50%接受OA治疗,20%接受PA治疗。本调查结果显示,OA治疗在Valle d’aosta地区用于预防脑缺血高危房颤患者缺血性卒中的应用较少。普通人群缺乏相关知识,像我们这样有严重合并症的患者难以开始治疗,以及缺乏缺乏组织的OA监测中心可能是导致这种低水平使用的主要原因。人群筛查或敏化活动可以增加对高危人群的识别,而更好地组织凝血监测中心可以鼓励脑缺血高危人群使用OA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信