Blood pressure measurement in haemodialysis patients.

T Cerrai, I Benedetti, F Della Scala, M Gori, S Nicolini, S Pampaloni, R Paolini, G C Piccioli, M Righi, R Romoli, S Torricelli
{"title":"Blood pressure measurement in haemodialysis patients.","authors":"T Cerrai,&nbsp;I Benedetti,&nbsp;F Della Scala,&nbsp;M Gori,&nbsp;S Nicolini,&nbsp;S Pampaloni,&nbsp;R Paolini,&nbsp;G C Piccioli,&nbsp;M Righi,&nbsp;R Romoli,&nbsp;S Torricelli","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-6686.1999.tb00020.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several studies suggest that the 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) predicts left ventricular hypertrophy more accurately than conventional blood pressure measurement (CBPM) with mercury sphygmomanometer. We estimated the left ventricular mass by M-mode echocardiography in 58 patients on regular haemodialysis treatment during the midweek haemodialysis (HD) interval. ABPM was recorded during the 24 hours preceding the dialysis session and the average of values were compared with the average of the 13 pre HD CBPM recorded by nurses during the month preceding the echocardiography study. The two types of BP measurements correlated significantly with each other, (systolic BP r = 0.62; p < 0.001 and diastolic BP r = 0.74; p < 0.001). The correlation of left ventricular mass with pre-HD systolic BP was stronger (r = 0.54; p < 0.001) than with 24h-systolic BP (r = 0.33; p < 0.01). The overall accuracy of prediction was also similar (68% for pre HD-CBPM; 67% for 24h-ABPM). Measurements of diastolic BP did not correlate significantly with LVM. Our data suggest that 24h-ABPM does not offer any advantage over pre HD-CBPM in predicting left ventricular hypertrophy in HD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":79589,"journal":{"name":"EDTNA/ERCA journal (English ed.)","volume":"25 2","pages":"9-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1755-6686.1999.tb00020.x","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDTNA/ERCA journal (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6686.1999.tb00020.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Several studies suggest that the 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) predicts left ventricular hypertrophy more accurately than conventional blood pressure measurement (CBPM) with mercury sphygmomanometer. We estimated the left ventricular mass by M-mode echocardiography in 58 patients on regular haemodialysis treatment during the midweek haemodialysis (HD) interval. ABPM was recorded during the 24 hours preceding the dialysis session and the average of values were compared with the average of the 13 pre HD CBPM recorded by nurses during the month preceding the echocardiography study. The two types of BP measurements correlated significantly with each other, (systolic BP r = 0.62; p < 0.001 and diastolic BP r = 0.74; p < 0.001). The correlation of left ventricular mass with pre-HD systolic BP was stronger (r = 0.54; p < 0.001) than with 24h-systolic BP (r = 0.33; p < 0.01). The overall accuracy of prediction was also similar (68% for pre HD-CBPM; 67% for 24h-ABPM). Measurements of diastolic BP did not correlate significantly with LVM. Our data suggest that 24h-ABPM does not offer any advantage over pre HD-CBPM in predicting left ventricular hypertrophy in HD patients.

血液透析患者的血压测量。
几项研究表明,24小时动态血压监测(ABPM)比传统的汞柱血压计血压测量(CBPM)更准确地预测左室肥厚。我们通过m型超声心动图估计了58例在周中血液透析(HD)间隔期间接受常规血液透析治疗的患者的左心室质量。在透析前24小时记录ABPM,并将其平均值与护士在超声心动图研究前一个月记录的13个HD前CBPM的平均值进行比较。两种类型的血压测量结果具有显著的相关性(收缩压r = 0.62;p < 0.001,舒张压r = 0.74;P < 0.001)。左室质量与hd前收缩压的相关性更强(r = 0.54;p < 0.001)高于24h收缩压(r = 0.33;P < 0.01)。预测的总体准确性也相似(HD-CBPM前为68%;67%为24h-ABPM)。舒张压测量值与LVM无显著相关性。我们的数据表明,在预测HD患者左室肥厚方面,24h-ABPM与HD- cbpm前相比没有任何优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书