Pre-dialysis education. A change in clinical practice. How effective is it?

EDTNA/ERCA journal (English ed.) Pub Date : 1999-04-01
A O'Donnell, L Tucker
{"title":"Pre-dialysis education. A change in clinical practice. How effective is it?","authors":"A O'Donnell,&nbsp;L Tucker","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The last decade has seen a great expansion in the provision of pre-dialysis education within the UK, with our programme in operation since 1996. In order to evaluate its impact on patient care, two methodologies were employed: the first used a satisfaction survey with which to examine patient perception of the programme; the second approach examined resource utilisation, in particular length of stay, as an outcome measure. Difficulties have arisen in discerning the impact of the programme amongst the other education interventions to which the patient is exposed. Comparative length of stay data was used as an alternative means of assessment. The results of the audit led us to question the effectiveness of the methodology that we employed and has led us to propose the development of a standard. It is hoped that the adoption of a more structured approach will not only aid the effectiveness of the programme itself but also facilitate the evaluation process.</p>","PeriodicalId":79589,"journal":{"name":"EDTNA/ERCA journal (English ed.)","volume":"25 2","pages":"29-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDTNA/ERCA journal (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The last decade has seen a great expansion in the provision of pre-dialysis education within the UK, with our programme in operation since 1996. In order to evaluate its impact on patient care, two methodologies were employed: the first used a satisfaction survey with which to examine patient perception of the programme; the second approach examined resource utilisation, in particular length of stay, as an outcome measure. Difficulties have arisen in discerning the impact of the programme amongst the other education interventions to which the patient is exposed. Comparative length of stay data was used as an alternative means of assessment. The results of the audit led us to question the effectiveness of the methodology that we employed and has led us to propose the development of a standard. It is hoped that the adoption of a more structured approach will not only aid the effectiveness of the programme itself but also facilitate the evaluation process.

Pre-dialysis教育。临床实践的改变。效果如何?
在过去的十年里,我们在英国的透析前教育有了很大的发展,我们的项目自1996年开始运作。为了评估其对患者护理的影响,采用了两种方法:第一种是使用满意度调查来检查患者对该计划的看法;第二种方法审查资源利用情况,特别是停留时间长短,以此作为结果衡量标准。在病人所面临的其他教育干预措施中,辨别该方案的影响出现了困难。比较停留时间数据被用作另一种评估手段。审计的结果使我们对我们所采用的方法的有效性提出了质疑,并使我们提出了制定标准的建议。希望采取更有组织的办法不仅有助于方案本身的效力,而且也有助于评价过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书