Employee exposure to diesel exhaust in the electric utility industry.

L S Whittaker, D L MacIntosh, P L Williams
{"title":"Employee exposure to diesel exhaust in the electric utility industry.","authors":"L S Whittaker,&nbsp;D L MacIntosh,&nbsp;P L Williams","doi":"10.1080/00028899908984484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to assess diesel exhaust exposures in the electric utility industry and to compare these findings with worker exposures reported in other industries and to proposed and established occupational exposure limits. Two sampling approaches were used: particulates were analyzed for elemental (EC) and organic (OC) carbon via the thermal-optical method; and gaseous components (NO2, SO2, NO, and CO) were determined using a direct reading instrument, the Metrosonics pm-7400. Concentrations of the gases were all well within established occupational exposure levels. The EC percentage of the total carbon was generally lower than results reported from other studies resulting in OC levels representing a higher percentage of the total carbon concentrations. Smokers had higher average OC exposure (79 micrograms/m3) than nonsmokers (57 micrograms/m3), but cigarette smoke did not contribute to EC levels in this study (smokers and nonsmokers = 3 micrograms/m3). Two of 120 individual personal exposure levels were found to exceed the proposed threshold limit value of 150 micrograms/m3 for total particulate, but geometric mean levels were found to be significantly less than the proposed value. Questions are raised concerning the use of EC as the sole surrogate for estimating diesel content for comparison with an exposure standard.</p>","PeriodicalId":7930,"journal":{"name":"American Industrial Hygiene Association journal","volume":"60 5","pages":"635-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00028899908984484","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Industrial Hygiene Association journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00028899908984484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess diesel exhaust exposures in the electric utility industry and to compare these findings with worker exposures reported in other industries and to proposed and established occupational exposure limits. Two sampling approaches were used: particulates were analyzed for elemental (EC) and organic (OC) carbon via the thermal-optical method; and gaseous components (NO2, SO2, NO, and CO) were determined using a direct reading instrument, the Metrosonics pm-7400. Concentrations of the gases were all well within established occupational exposure levels. The EC percentage of the total carbon was generally lower than results reported from other studies resulting in OC levels representing a higher percentage of the total carbon concentrations. Smokers had higher average OC exposure (79 micrograms/m3) than nonsmokers (57 micrograms/m3), but cigarette smoke did not contribute to EC levels in this study (smokers and nonsmokers = 3 micrograms/m3). Two of 120 individual personal exposure levels were found to exceed the proposed threshold limit value of 150 micrograms/m3 for total particulate, but geometric mean levels were found to be significantly less than the proposed value. Questions are raised concerning the use of EC as the sole surrogate for estimating diesel content for comparison with an exposure standard.

电力公司员工接触到的柴油废气。
本研究的目的是评估电力行业的柴油废气暴露情况,并将这些发现与其他行业报告的工人暴露情况进行比较,并提出和确定职业暴露限值。采用了两种采样方法:通过热光学方法分析颗粒中的元素(EC)和有机(OC)碳;气体组分(NO2、SO2、NO和CO)使用直读仪Metrosonics pm-7400进行测定。这些气体的浓度都完全在既定的职业暴露水平之内。欧共体占总碳的百分比通常低于其他研究报告的结果,导致欧共体水平占总碳浓度的百分比较高。吸烟者的平均暴露量(79微克/立方米)高于不吸烟者(57微克/立方米),但在本研究中,吸烟对EC水平没有影响(吸烟者和不吸烟者= 3微克/立方米)。在120个个人接触水平中,发现有两个超过了总颗粒物150微克/立方米的建议阈值,但几何平均水平明显低于建议值。关于使用EC作为估计柴油含量与暴露标准进行比较的唯一替代方法,提出了一些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信