Performances of Hill-Type and Neural Network Muscle Models—Toward a Myosignal-Based Exoskeleton

Jacob Rosen , Moshe B. Fuchs , Mircea Arcan
{"title":"Performances of Hill-Type and Neural Network Muscle Models—Toward a Myosignal-Based Exoskeleton","authors":"Jacob Rosen ,&nbsp;Moshe B. Fuchs ,&nbsp;Mircea Arcan","doi":"10.1006/cbmr.1999.1524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Muscle models are the essential components of any musculoskeletal simulation. In addition, muscle models which are incorporated in neural-based prosthetic and orthotic devices may significantly improve their performance. The aim of the study was to compare the performances of two types of muscle models in terms of predicting the moments developed at the human elbow joint complex based on joint kinematics and neuromuscular activity. The performance evaluation of the muscle models was required to implement them in a powered myosignal-driven exoskeleton (orthotic device). The experimental setup included a passive exoskeleton capable of measuring the joint kinematics and dynamics in addition to the muscle myosignal activity (EMG). Two types of models were developed and analyzed: (i) a Hill-based model and (ii) a neural network. The task, which was selected for evaluating the muscle models performance, was the flexion–extension movement of the forearm with a hand-held weight. For this task the muscle model inputs were the normalized neural activation levels of the four main flexor–extensor muscles of the elbow joint, and the elbow joint angle and angular velocity. Using this inputs, the muscle model predicted the moment applied on the elbow joint during the movement. Results indicated a good performance of the Hill model, although the neural network predictions appeared to be superior. Relative advantages and shortcomings of both approaches were presented and discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75733,"journal":{"name":"Computers and biomedical research, an international journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1006/cbmr.1999.1524","citationCount":"132","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and biomedical research, an international journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010480999915240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 132

Abstract

Muscle models are the essential components of any musculoskeletal simulation. In addition, muscle models which are incorporated in neural-based prosthetic and orthotic devices may significantly improve their performance. The aim of the study was to compare the performances of two types of muscle models in terms of predicting the moments developed at the human elbow joint complex based on joint kinematics and neuromuscular activity. The performance evaluation of the muscle models was required to implement them in a powered myosignal-driven exoskeleton (orthotic device). The experimental setup included a passive exoskeleton capable of measuring the joint kinematics and dynamics in addition to the muscle myosignal activity (EMG). Two types of models were developed and analyzed: (i) a Hill-based model and (ii) a neural network. The task, which was selected for evaluating the muscle models performance, was the flexion–extension movement of the forearm with a hand-held weight. For this task the muscle model inputs were the normalized neural activation levels of the four main flexor–extensor muscles of the elbow joint, and the elbow joint angle and angular velocity. Using this inputs, the muscle model predicted the moment applied on the elbow joint during the movement. Results indicated a good performance of the Hill model, although the neural network predictions appeared to be superior. Relative advantages and shortcomings of both approaches were presented and discussed.

Hill-Type和神经网络肌肉模型的性能——迈向基于肌肉信号的外骨骼
肌肉模型是任何肌肉骨骼模拟的基本组成部分。此外,肌肉模型纳入基于神经的假肢和矫形装置可以显著提高其性能。该研究的目的是比较两种类型的肌肉模型的性能,在基于关节运动学和神经肌肉活动预测在人类肘关节复杂发展的时刻。肌肉模型的性能评估需要在动力肌信号驱动的外骨骼(矫形装置)中实现。实验装置包括一个被动外骨骼,能够测量关节运动学和动力学以及肌肉肌信号活动(EMG)。开发并分析了两种模型:(i)基于hill的模型和(ii)神经网络模型。该任务被选择来评估肌肉模型的表现,是前臂的屈伸运动与手持重量。在这项任务中,肌肉模型输入是肘关节的四个主要屈伸肌的归一化神经激活水平,以及肘关节的角度和角速度。使用这些输入,肌肉模型预测运动过程中施加在肘关节上的力矩。结果表明Hill模型的性能良好,尽管神经网络预测似乎更优越。介绍并讨论了这两种方法的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信