M C Norton, J A Tschanz, X Fan, B L Plassman, K A Welsh-Bohmer, N West, B W Wyse, J C Breitner
{"title":"Telephone adaptation of the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (3MS). The Cache County Study.","authors":"M C Norton, J A Tschanz, X Fan, B L Plassman, K A Welsh-Bohmer, N West, B W Wyse, J C Breitner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the concurrent validity of a newly developed telephone adaptation of the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Longitudinal studies of cognition may be advantaged by availability of assessment instruments that can be used over the telephone, as well as in person.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Subjects were 263 noninstitutionalized elderly residents of a rural community in southern Idaho, aged 65 to 93, who had little or no cognitive difficulty. At an average interval of four weeks, we administered the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (3MS) and the newly adapted Telephone Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (T3MS). Order of administration was randomly assigned.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Agreement between scores on the two instruments was good (r = 0.82, p < 0.001). When we applied various cutoff scores to the instruments, thereby generating assignments of individuals to \"screen positive\" and \"screen negative\" groups, the percent agreement in screening results ranged from 80% to 96% as we reduced the cutoff scores from 90 to 74 (100 points possible).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At least among subjects without major cognitive syndromes, the Telephone Modified Mini-Mental State Exam provides a reasonable substitute for the more costly in-person 3MS. The telephone instrument should now be tested over a broader range of cognitive abilities in order to assess its validity in more impaired subjects, e.g., by studying an institutionalized sample.</p>","PeriodicalId":79516,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and behavioral neurology","volume":"12 4","pages":"270-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and behavioral neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To examine the concurrent validity of a newly developed telephone adaptation of the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam.
Background: Longitudinal studies of cognition may be advantaged by availability of assessment instruments that can be used over the telephone, as well as in person.
Method: Subjects were 263 noninstitutionalized elderly residents of a rural community in southern Idaho, aged 65 to 93, who had little or no cognitive difficulty. At an average interval of four weeks, we administered the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (3MS) and the newly adapted Telephone Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (T3MS). Order of administration was randomly assigned.
Results: Agreement between scores on the two instruments was good (r = 0.82, p < 0.001). When we applied various cutoff scores to the instruments, thereby generating assignments of individuals to "screen positive" and "screen negative" groups, the percent agreement in screening results ranged from 80% to 96% as we reduced the cutoff scores from 90 to 74 (100 points possible).
Conclusions: At least among subjects without major cognitive syndromes, the Telephone Modified Mini-Mental State Exam provides a reasonable substitute for the more costly in-person 3MS. The telephone instrument should now be tested over a broader range of cognitive abilities in order to assess its validity in more impaired subjects, e.g., by studying an institutionalized sample.