Quantitative EEG during early recovery from hypoxic-ischemic injury in immature piglets: burst occurrence and duration.

D L Sherman, A M Brambrink, R N Ichord, V K Dasika, R C Koehler, R J Traystman, D F Hanley, N V Thakor
{"title":"Quantitative EEG during early recovery from hypoxic-ischemic injury in immature piglets: burst occurrence and duration.","authors":"D L Sherman,&nbsp;A M Brambrink,&nbsp;R N Ichord,&nbsp;V K Dasika,&nbsp;R C Koehler,&nbsp;R J Traystman,&nbsp;D F Hanley,&nbsp;N V Thakor","doi":"10.1177/155005949903000410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined the course of EEG recovery in an animal model of hypoxic-ischemic injury. The model used periods of hypoxia, room air and asphyxia to induce cardiac arrest. One-week-old piglets (n = 16) were exposed to a period of hypoxia, room air and complete asphyxia for 7 minutes. After cardiac arrest and resuscitation, two EEG features were evaluated as prognostic indicators of behavioral outcome as assessed by a neuroscore at 24 hours after insult. A prominent EEG feature was the number and duration of bursts evident during recovery. Episodes of bursting were detected through the thresholds on sustained periods of elevated power. After the animal was resuscitated, the EEG was monitored continuously for 4 hours. To assess outcome in the recovering animal, a behavioral testing scale was used to test the animal's neurological capabilities. Trends of EEG burst counts were measured through thresholds on sustained power changes. Bursts are energy transients in the EEG record. High degrees of bursting were characteristic of animals having good neurological condition whereas piglets having low burst counts had poor 24 hr neuroscores. At 100 min the average burst rate of the good neuroscore outcome group was more than 8 per min and was significantly different from the poor outcome group's level of 2.7 (p < or = 0.05). When these counts were weighted by their total duration, differences between groups increased (p < or = 0.02). This study showed that the QEEG measure of burst counts and duration together provided a strong prognostic indication of the 24 hour outcome after asphyxic injury in a neonatal animal model. The critical determinant of the bursting character was the time when bursting occurred. Bursting occurring early in recovery was a good gauge of outcome. We conclude that quantitative EEG analysis and interpretation can be an important tool for the outcome determination during recovery from cerebral injury states.</p>","PeriodicalId":75713,"journal":{"name":"Clinical EEG (electroencephalography)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/155005949903000410","citationCount":"43","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical EEG (electroencephalography)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/155005949903000410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

Abstract

This study examined the course of EEG recovery in an animal model of hypoxic-ischemic injury. The model used periods of hypoxia, room air and asphyxia to induce cardiac arrest. One-week-old piglets (n = 16) were exposed to a period of hypoxia, room air and complete asphyxia for 7 minutes. After cardiac arrest and resuscitation, two EEG features were evaluated as prognostic indicators of behavioral outcome as assessed by a neuroscore at 24 hours after insult. A prominent EEG feature was the number and duration of bursts evident during recovery. Episodes of bursting were detected through the thresholds on sustained periods of elevated power. After the animal was resuscitated, the EEG was monitored continuously for 4 hours. To assess outcome in the recovering animal, a behavioral testing scale was used to test the animal's neurological capabilities. Trends of EEG burst counts were measured through thresholds on sustained power changes. Bursts are energy transients in the EEG record. High degrees of bursting were characteristic of animals having good neurological condition whereas piglets having low burst counts had poor 24 hr neuroscores. At 100 min the average burst rate of the good neuroscore outcome group was more than 8 per min and was significantly different from the poor outcome group's level of 2.7 (p < or = 0.05). When these counts were weighted by their total duration, differences between groups increased (p < or = 0.02). This study showed that the QEEG measure of burst counts and duration together provided a strong prognostic indication of the 24 hour outcome after asphyxic injury in a neonatal animal model. The critical determinant of the bursting character was the time when bursting occurred. Bursting occurring early in recovery was a good gauge of outcome. We conclude that quantitative EEG analysis and interpretation can be an important tool for the outcome determination during recovery from cerebral injury states.

未成熟仔猪缺氧缺血性损伤恢复早期的定量脑电图:爆发的发生和持续时间。
本研究观察了缺氧缺血性损伤动物模型的脑电图恢复过程。该模型采用缺氧、室内空气和窒息来诱导心脏骤停。将16头1周龄仔猪分别置于缺氧、室内空气和完全窒息7分钟的环境中。在心脏骤停和复苏后,两种脑电图特征被评估为行为结果的预后指标,并在损伤后24小时通过神经评分进行评估。一个突出的EEG特征是在恢复过程中明显的爆发次数和持续时间。在持续的高功率时期,通过阈值检测到爆发事件。苏醒后,连续监测脑电图4小时。为了评估康复动物的结果,使用行为测试量表来测试动物的神经功能。通过持续功率变化的阈值测量脑电图爆发计数的趋势。脉冲是脑电图记录中的能量瞬变。高爆裂程度是神经系统状况良好的动物的特征,而低爆裂次数的仔猪24小时神经评分较差。100 min时,神经评分良好结局组的平均发作率大于8次/ min,与预后不良组的2.7次/ min有显著性差异(p <或= 0.05)。当这些计数以总持续时间加权时,组间差异增大(p <或= 0.02)。这项研究表明,QEEG测量爆发次数和持续时间一起为新生儿动物模型中窒息损伤后24小时的预后提供了强有力的指示。爆破特性的关键决定因素是发生爆破的时间。经济复苏初期出现的泡沫破裂是衡量结果的一个很好的指标。我们认为定量脑电图分析和解释可以作为判断脑损伤状态恢复结果的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信