Fatigue profile: a numerical method to examine fatigue in cycle ergometry.

C Karatzaferi, G Giakas, D Ball
{"title":"Fatigue profile: a numerical method to examine fatigue in cycle ergometry.","authors":"C Karatzaferi,&nbsp;G Giakas,&nbsp;D Ball","doi":"10.1007/s004210050626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fatigue Profile, a new numerical method for characterising fatigue in isokinetic cycle ergometry is presented and compared with the conventional fatigue index (FI). The new method describes the temporal development of muscle fatigue based on the decline of peak power output throughout a whole trial. The advantage of this method is demonstrated by the analysis of two 25 s maximum trials, separated by 90 s recovery, performed by a well-trained athlete at a pedal frequency of 120 revolutions per minute. A fourth degree polynomial was fitted to model the peak power data. Using the polynomial model coefficients the first derivative represented the rate of changing peak power which represented the Fatigue Profile. The conventional FI was calculated as -35 Ws(-1) and -32 Ws(-1) for trials 1 and 2 respectively, indicating minor differences in fatigue between trials. In contrast the Fatigue Profile revealed important numeric and temporal differences between the trials. For trial 1 a maximum rate of peak power decline of -65 Ws(-1) was reached at approximately 6 s into the trial. In marked contrast, in trial 2, maximum rate of peak power decline (-146 Ws(-1)) occurred immediately. The Fatigue Profile approach allows the characterisation of the temporal development of fatigue under different experimental conditions and in combination with other techniques may yield further insight into the underlying mechanisms of fatigue.</p>","PeriodicalId":11936,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s004210050626","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s004210050626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Fatigue Profile, a new numerical method for characterising fatigue in isokinetic cycle ergometry is presented and compared with the conventional fatigue index (FI). The new method describes the temporal development of muscle fatigue based on the decline of peak power output throughout a whole trial. The advantage of this method is demonstrated by the analysis of two 25 s maximum trials, separated by 90 s recovery, performed by a well-trained athlete at a pedal frequency of 120 revolutions per minute. A fourth degree polynomial was fitted to model the peak power data. Using the polynomial model coefficients the first derivative represented the rate of changing peak power which represented the Fatigue Profile. The conventional FI was calculated as -35 Ws(-1) and -32 Ws(-1) for trials 1 and 2 respectively, indicating minor differences in fatigue between trials. In contrast the Fatigue Profile revealed important numeric and temporal differences between the trials. For trial 1 a maximum rate of peak power decline of -65 Ws(-1) was reached at approximately 6 s into the trial. In marked contrast, in trial 2, maximum rate of peak power decline (-146 Ws(-1)) occurred immediately. The Fatigue Profile approach allows the characterisation of the temporal development of fatigue under different experimental conditions and in combination with other techniques may yield further insight into the underlying mechanisms of fatigue.

疲劳剖面:周期几何中检验疲劳的一种数值方法。
提出了等速循环几何中表征疲劳的一种新的数值方法——疲劳剖面,并与传统的疲劳指数(FI)进行了比较。在整个试验过程中,新方法根据峰值输出功率的下降来描述肌肉疲劳的时间发展。通过对训练有素的运动员在每分钟120转的踏板频率下进行的两次25秒最大试验(间隔为90秒恢复)的分析,证明了该方法的优点。采用四次多项式拟合峰值功率数据。利用多项式模型系数,一阶导数表示代表疲劳剖面的峰值功率变化率。试验1和试验2的常规FI分别计算为-35 w(-1)和-32 w(-1),表明试验之间的疲劳差异很小。相反,疲劳剖面揭示了试验之间重要的数值和时间差异。对于试验1,在试验开始约6 s时,峰值功率下降的最大速率达到-65 w(-1)。与此形成鲜明对比的是,在试验2中,峰值功率下降的最大速率(-146 w(-1))立即发生。疲劳剖面方法允许在不同实验条件下描述疲劳的时间发展,并与其他技术相结合,可以进一步深入了解疲劳的潜在机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信