Cardiorespiratory dynamics: sensitivity of the on-transition to endurance-training status.

N A Taylor, M A Osborne, T L Bube, J M Stocks
{"title":"Cardiorespiratory dynamics: sensitivity of the on-transition to endurance-training status.","authors":"N A Taylor,&nbsp;M A Osborne,&nbsp;T L Bube,&nbsp;J M Stocks","doi":"10.1007/s004210050625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This project investigated the sensitivity of oxygen uptake (VO(2)) dynamics to training-induced physiological changes, across a broad spectrum of endurance-training histories. Forty subjects participated: sedentary (n = 10), active healthy (n = 10), regular runners (n = 10), and competitive distance runners (n = 10). Subjects completed a cycle step-function protocol, to elicit a steady state at 60% maximal work rate. Breath-by-breath data were collected for VO(2) and cardiac frequency (f(c)), and modelled mathematically, and used to determine the average response times to attain 20%, 40%, 60%, 80% and 100% of the respective steady states. The between-group comparisons for both VO(2) and f(c) revealed significantly faster response times to 40%, 60%, 80% and 100% of the induced response, for the better trained subjects (P < 0.05). In general, this technique permitted differentiation between the VO(2) and f(c) response dynamics of non-elite subjects from a broad range of endurance-training histories, with differences becoming more pronounced as subjects approached the steady state.</p>","PeriodicalId":11936,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s004210050625","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s004210050625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This project investigated the sensitivity of oxygen uptake (VO(2)) dynamics to training-induced physiological changes, across a broad spectrum of endurance-training histories. Forty subjects participated: sedentary (n = 10), active healthy (n = 10), regular runners (n = 10), and competitive distance runners (n = 10). Subjects completed a cycle step-function protocol, to elicit a steady state at 60% maximal work rate. Breath-by-breath data were collected for VO(2) and cardiac frequency (f(c)), and modelled mathematically, and used to determine the average response times to attain 20%, 40%, 60%, 80% and 100% of the respective steady states. The between-group comparisons for both VO(2) and f(c) revealed significantly faster response times to 40%, 60%, 80% and 100% of the induced response, for the better trained subjects (P < 0.05). In general, this technique permitted differentiation between the VO(2) and f(c) response dynamics of non-elite subjects from a broad range of endurance-training histories, with differences becoming more pronounced as subjects approached the steady state.

心肺动力学:过渡到耐力训练状态的敏感性。
本项目研究了在广泛的耐力训练历史中,氧摄取(VO(2))动态对训练引起的生理变化的敏感性。40名受试者参与:久坐(n = 10)、积极健康(n = 10)、经常跑步(n = 10)和竞技长跑(n = 10)。受试者完成一个循环阶跃函数方案,以达到60%最大工作速率的稳定状态。收集VO(2)和心脏频率(f(c))的逐次呼吸数据,并进行数学建模,并用于确定达到各自稳定状态的20%,40%,60%,80%和100%的平均响应时间。VO(2)和f(c)的组间比较显示,训练较好的被试对诱导反应的40%、60%、80%和100%的反应时间明显较快(P < 0.05)。一般来说,这种技术允许区分非精英受试者的VO(2)和f(c)反应动态,这些受试者来自广泛的耐力训练历史,当受试者接近稳定状态时,差异变得更加明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信