Disease management in ulcer disease.

W A de Boer, E A Joosen
{"title":"Disease management in ulcer disease.","authors":"W A de Boer,&nbsp;E A Joosen","doi":"10.1080/003655299750025507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our knowledge of Helicobacter pylori infection indicates that it is possible to eliminate ulcer disease and improve quality of life for ulcer patients. Treatment is evidence-based and cost-effective. However, though we now have the tools, we have not yet been able to eliminate ulcer disease from society. Dissemination of knowledge and treatment implementation have been problematic. In primary care, there is diagnostic and therapeutic chaos regarding this infection. Disagreement exists on indications for treatment. Expenditure on acid-reducing drugs has greatly increased. Clearly we are not treating all ulcer patients properly (undertreatment); instead we have incorporated H. pylori therapy ('test and treat') into our approach to dyspepsia (overtreatment). Anti-H. pylori therapy in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia may increase costs because most patients still suffer from symptoms after antibiotic therapy, and therefore require further diagnostic procedures and prescription of new drugs. In order to redeem the great promise of H. pylori, we must focus less on new ulcer patients, because the incidence is rapidly decreasing in Western Europe. Prevalence of ulcer disease, however, is still high. Thus we need to focus more on prevalent cases. We ought to seek and treat those persons already known to have ulcer disease. Systematic 'case-finding' strategies must be performed using standard protocols. Only such 'disease management' programmes performed at the primary care level will suffice to eliminate ulcer disease while also being cost-effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":21517,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology. Supplement","volume":"230 ","pages":"23-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/003655299750025507","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/003655299750025507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background: Our knowledge of Helicobacter pylori infection indicates that it is possible to eliminate ulcer disease and improve quality of life for ulcer patients. Treatment is evidence-based and cost-effective. However, though we now have the tools, we have not yet been able to eliminate ulcer disease from society. Dissemination of knowledge and treatment implementation have been problematic. In primary care, there is diagnostic and therapeutic chaos regarding this infection. Disagreement exists on indications for treatment. Expenditure on acid-reducing drugs has greatly increased. Clearly we are not treating all ulcer patients properly (undertreatment); instead we have incorporated H. pylori therapy ('test and treat') into our approach to dyspepsia (overtreatment). Anti-H. pylori therapy in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia may increase costs because most patients still suffer from symptoms after antibiotic therapy, and therefore require further diagnostic procedures and prescription of new drugs. In order to redeem the great promise of H. pylori, we must focus less on new ulcer patients, because the incidence is rapidly decreasing in Western Europe. Prevalence of ulcer disease, however, is still high. Thus we need to focus more on prevalent cases. We ought to seek and treat those persons already known to have ulcer disease. Systematic 'case-finding' strategies must be performed using standard protocols. Only such 'disease management' programmes performed at the primary care level will suffice to eliminate ulcer disease while also being cost-effective.

溃疡疾病的疾病管理。
背景:我们对幽门螺杆菌感染的了解表明,它可以消除溃疡疾病,提高溃疡患者的生活质量。治疗是循证且具有成本效益的。然而,尽管我们现在有了工具,我们还没有能够从社会上消除溃疡疾病。知识的传播和治疗的实施一直存在问题。在初级保健中,对这种感染的诊断和治疗存在混乱。在治疗的适应症上存在分歧。降酸药物的支出大大增加。显然,我们并没有正确治疗所有溃疡患者(治疗不足);相反,我们将幽门螺杆菌疗法(“检测和治疗”)纳入我们治疗消化不良(过度治疗)的方法中。Anti-H。对非溃疡性消化不良患者进行幽门螺杆菌治疗可能会增加费用,因为大多数患者在抗生素治疗后仍有症状,因此需要进一步的诊断程序和新药处方。为了挽回幽门螺杆菌的巨大希望,我们必须减少对新发溃疡患者的关注,因为西欧的发病率正在迅速下降。然而,溃疡的患病率仍然很高。因此,我们需要更多地关注流行病例。我们应该寻找和治疗那些已经知道有溃疡的人。必须使用标准方案执行系统的“病例发现”策略。只有在初级保健一级实施这种“疾病管理”规划才足以消除溃疡疾病,同时也具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信