Mortality rates following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

S R Walker, J Macierewicz, S T MacSweeney, R H Gregson, S C Whitaker, P W Wenham, B R Hopkinson
{"title":"Mortality rates following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.","authors":"S R Walker,&nbsp;J Macierewicz,&nbsp;S T MacSweeney,&nbsp;R H Gregson,&nbsp;S C Whitaker,&nbsp;P W Wenham,&nbsp;B R Hopkinson","doi":"10.1583/1074-6218(1999)006<0233:MRFERO>2.0.CO;2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To present the perioperative and late mortality following endovascular repair (EVR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected prospectively on 221 patients undergoing AAA EVR over a 4-year period (median 5-month follow-up). Patients were classified preoperatively as high risk with at least 1 of these features: serum creatinine > 150 micromol/L, ischemic heart disease or poor left ventricular function, respiratory function < 50% of predicted normal, ruptured or symptomatic AAA, contraindication to or failed open repair, and age > 80 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred forty (63.3%) patients were classified as high risk, the most common criterion being cardiac disease (n = 96, 68.6%). There were 25 (11.3%) deaths in the 30-day perioperative period, 22 (15.7%) in the high-risk group compared to 3 (3.7%) in the acceptable-risk group (p = 0.02). The most common causes of perioperative death were multisystem organ failure and myocardial infarction. A further 21 (9.5%) late deaths occurred, 16 (11.4%) in the high-risk group and 5 (6.2%) in the acceptable-risk group (p > 0.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The mortality of patients at acceptable risk undergoing EVR compares with the best published series for conventional open AAA repair. The perioperative and late mortality in the high-risk patients are substantially higher.</p>","PeriodicalId":79443,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endovascular surgery : the official journal of the International Society for Endovascular Surgery","volume":"6 3","pages":"233-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endovascular surgery : the official journal of the International Society for Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1583/1074-6218(1999)006<0233:MRFERO>2.0.CO;2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Purpose: To present the perioperative and late mortality following endovascular repair (EVR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).

Methods: Data were collected prospectively on 221 patients undergoing AAA EVR over a 4-year period (median 5-month follow-up). Patients were classified preoperatively as high risk with at least 1 of these features: serum creatinine > 150 micromol/L, ischemic heart disease or poor left ventricular function, respiratory function < 50% of predicted normal, ruptured or symptomatic AAA, contraindication to or failed open repair, and age > 80 years.

Results: One hundred forty (63.3%) patients were classified as high risk, the most common criterion being cardiac disease (n = 96, 68.6%). There were 25 (11.3%) deaths in the 30-day perioperative period, 22 (15.7%) in the high-risk group compared to 3 (3.7%) in the acceptable-risk group (p = 0.02). The most common causes of perioperative death were multisystem organ failure and myocardial infarction. A further 21 (9.5%) late deaths occurred, 16 (11.4%) in the high-risk group and 5 (6.2%) in the acceptable-risk group (p > 0.1).

Conclusions: The mortality of patients at acceptable risk undergoing EVR compares with the best published series for conventional open AAA repair. The perioperative and late mortality in the high-risk patients are substantially higher.

腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术后死亡率。
目的:探讨腹主动脉瘤(AAAs)血管内修复(EVR)术后围手术期及晚期死亡率。方法:前瞻性收集221例接受AAA EVR的患者4年(中位随访5个月)的数据。患者术前被分类为具有以下至少1项特征的高危患者:血清肌酐> 150微mol/L,缺血性心脏病或左心室功能差,呼吸功能<预测正常的50%,破裂或症状性AAA,开放修复禁忌或失败,年龄> 80岁。结果:140例(63.3%)患者被归为高危,最常见的标准为心脏疾病(n = 96, 68.6%)。围手术期30天有25例(11.3%)死亡,高危组22例(15.7%),可接受风险组3例(3.7%)(p = 0.02)。围手术期死亡的最常见原因是多系统器官衰竭和心肌梗死。晚期死亡21例(9.5%),高危组16例(11.4%),可接受风险组5例(6.2%)(p > 0.1)。结论:在可接受的风险下,接受EVR的患者的死亡率与已发表的最佳系列的常规开放式AAA修复相比。高危患者的围手术期和晚期死亡率明显较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信