Tumour epidermal growth factor receptor, erbB-2 and cathepsin D in node-negative invasive breast cancer: their impact on the selection of patients for systemic adjuvant therapy.

K S Tonkin, J W McKay, L W Stitt, S Tokmakejian, D S Haines
{"title":"Tumour epidermal growth factor receptor, erbB-2 and cathepsin D in node-negative invasive breast cancer: their impact on the selection of patients for systemic adjuvant therapy.","authors":"K S Tonkin,&nbsp;J W McKay,&nbsp;L W Stitt,&nbsp;S Tokmakejian,&nbsp;D S Haines","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the feasibility and the economic impact of tumour EGFR, erbB-2 and cathepsin-D measurements in women with node-negative breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Consecutive tumour samples received at a regional steroid receptor laboratory from patients with node-negative breast cancer were evaluated with commercially available kits to determine EGFR, erbB-2 and cathepsin-D levels.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>All node-negative patients whose tumours were submitted to the steroid receptor laboratory from November 1992 to March 1994 were included (n = 142). A control group of concurrent node-negative breast cancer patients from the London Regional Cancer Centre (LRCC) database were also evaluated to determine the representativeness of our sample.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>To determine the proportion of patients who were positive for the 3 newer prognostic factors relative to their risk of relapse.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found 75 positive values in 69 patients (48.6%). We demonstrated that each factor identified a different high-risk subgroup. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) positivity (> 10 fmol/mg protein) was found in 16.3% of patients, with 19.9% of patients positive for erbB-2 (> 250 units/mg protein) and 17.3% positive for cathepsin D (> 70 pmol/mg protein). Between 10% and 23.2% more node-negative patients currently seen in a regional cancer centre could be offered systemic adjuvant chemotherapy based on a single positive new factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These tumour evaluations are straightforward using material already available in a regional steroid receptor laboratory or on tumour tissue available to pathologists. The economic impact is minimal; the 1995 cost of performing all 3 evaluations is Can$425-616 (US$304-440) per patient treated depending on the number of assays per run. Prospective clinical trials incorporating tumour EGFR, erbB-2 and cathepsin D are feasible and economically viable.</p>","PeriodicalId":79570,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC","volume":"3 2","pages":"131-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the feasibility and the economic impact of tumour EGFR, erbB-2 and cathepsin-D measurements in women with node-negative breast cancer.

Design: Consecutive tumour samples received at a regional steroid receptor laboratory from patients with node-negative breast cancer were evaluated with commercially available kits to determine EGFR, erbB-2 and cathepsin-D levels.

Setting: All node-negative patients whose tumours were submitted to the steroid receptor laboratory from November 1992 to March 1994 were included (n = 142). A control group of concurrent node-negative breast cancer patients from the London Regional Cancer Centre (LRCC) database were also evaluated to determine the representativeness of our sample.

Main outcome measure: To determine the proportion of patients who were positive for the 3 newer prognostic factors relative to their risk of relapse.

Results: We found 75 positive values in 69 patients (48.6%). We demonstrated that each factor identified a different high-risk subgroup. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) positivity (> 10 fmol/mg protein) was found in 16.3% of patients, with 19.9% of patients positive for erbB-2 (> 250 units/mg protein) and 17.3% positive for cathepsin D (> 70 pmol/mg protein). Between 10% and 23.2% more node-negative patients currently seen in a regional cancer centre could be offered systemic adjuvant chemotherapy based on a single positive new factor.

Conclusions: These tumour evaluations are straightforward using material already available in a regional steroid receptor laboratory or on tumour tissue available to pathologists. The economic impact is minimal; the 1995 cost of performing all 3 evaluations is Can$425-616 (US$304-440) per patient treated depending on the number of assays per run. Prospective clinical trials incorporating tumour EGFR, erbB-2 and cathepsin D are feasible and economically viable.

肿瘤表皮生长因子受体erbB-2和组织蛋白酶D在淋巴结阴性浸润性乳腺癌中的作用:它们对全身辅助治疗患者选择的影响
目的:探讨肿瘤EGFR、erbB-2和组织蛋白酶- d检测在淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者中的可行性和经济影响。设计:在区域类固醇受体实验室接收淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者的连续肿瘤样本,使用市售试剂盒评估EGFR, erbB-2和组织蛋白酶- d水平。研究对象:1992年11月至1994年3月期间,所有淋巴结阴性的类固醇受体实验室肿瘤患者(n = 142)。我们还对来自伦敦地区癌症中心(LRCC)数据库的并发淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者的对照组进行了评估,以确定我们样本的代表性。主要结局指标:确定3种新预后因素阳性的患者与复发风险的比例。结果:69例患者中75例阳性,占48.6%。我们证明了每个因素确定了不同的高危亚组。16.3%的患者表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)阳性(> 10 fmol/mg蛋白),19.9%的患者erbB-2阳性(> 250单位/mg蛋白),17.3%的患者组织蛋白酶D阳性(> 70 pmol/mg蛋白)。目前在区域癌症中心看到的淋巴结阴性患者中,有10%至23.2%的患者可以基于单一阳性的新因素进行全身辅助化疗。结论:这些肿瘤评估是直接使用材料已经在区域类固醇受体实验室或肿瘤组织病理学家可用。经济影响微乎其微;1995年进行所有3项评估的费用为每位接受治疗的患者425-616澳元(304-440美元),具体取决于每次检测的次数。纳入肿瘤EGFR、erbB-2和组织蛋白酶D的前瞻性临床试验是可行的,在经济上也是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信