Propinox in biliary colic: a multicenter, randomized, prospective and parallel double-blind study of three doses of propinox versus placebo in acute biliary colic pain.

A R de los Santos, M L Martí, G Di Girolamo, J Diego Espinosa, M A Morano, J C Tobar, C Del Prete
{"title":"Propinox in biliary colic: a multicenter, randomized, prospective and parallel double-blind study of three doses of propinox versus placebo in acute biliary colic pain.","authors":"A R de los Santos,&nbsp;M L Martí,&nbsp;G Di Girolamo,&nbsp;J Diego Espinosa,&nbsp;M A Morano,&nbsp;J C Tobar,&nbsp;C Del Prete","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerance of propinox administered i.v., and establish a dose-response relation according to three dose levels (10, 20 and 30 mg), vs. placebo in patients with moderate to severe acute biliary pain. Three hundred and fifty patients were included: 85 received placebo treatment, 81 were treated with propinox 10 mg, 91 with propinox 20 mg and 93 received propinox 30 mg. Spontaneous pain intensity was assessed according to a visual analog and a verbal scale before treatment and 20, 60 and 120 min after. All treatments induced significant and progressive pain reduction at all controls, but patients treated with 20 and 30 mg of propinox showed significantly lower pain intensity after 120 min compared to the placebo group. The last control revealed that 28% of patients receiving placebo had no pain while 60% of patients treated with propinox 30 mg reported absence of pain with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). All treatments were very well tolerated and there were no dropouts due to adverse events. Mouth dryness was the adverse effect occurring with a significantly higher frequency than that observed with placebo although it was only seen in patients treated with 20 mg and 30 mg active doses. The results of this study showed that propinox was an effective drug in the treatment of moderate to severe colic pain of biliary origin. Concerning efficacy and side effects, a clear dose-response relation was observed; the 20 mg and 30 mg doses being significantly superior to placebo.</p>","PeriodicalId":14404,"journal":{"name":"International journal of tissue reactions","volume":"21 1","pages":"13-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of tissue reactions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerance of propinox administered i.v., and establish a dose-response relation according to three dose levels (10, 20 and 30 mg), vs. placebo in patients with moderate to severe acute biliary pain. Three hundred and fifty patients were included: 85 received placebo treatment, 81 were treated with propinox 10 mg, 91 with propinox 20 mg and 93 received propinox 30 mg. Spontaneous pain intensity was assessed according to a visual analog and a verbal scale before treatment and 20, 60 and 120 min after. All treatments induced significant and progressive pain reduction at all controls, but patients treated with 20 and 30 mg of propinox showed significantly lower pain intensity after 120 min compared to the placebo group. The last control revealed that 28% of patients receiving placebo had no pain while 60% of patients treated with propinox 30 mg reported absence of pain with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). All treatments were very well tolerated and there were no dropouts due to adverse events. Mouth dryness was the adverse effect occurring with a significantly higher frequency than that observed with placebo although it was only seen in patients treated with 20 mg and 30 mg active doses. The results of this study showed that propinox was an effective drug in the treatment of moderate to severe colic pain of biliary origin. Concerning efficacy and side effects, a clear dose-response relation was observed; the 20 mg and 30 mg doses being significantly superior to placebo.

丙炔醇治疗胆绞痛:一项多中心、随机、前瞻性、平行双盲研究,比较三剂量丙炔醇与安慰剂治疗急性胆绞痛的疗效。
本研究的目的是评估丙炔诺静脉给药的疗效和耐受性,并根据三个剂量水平(10、20和30 mg)与安慰剂建立剂量-反应关系,用于中重度急性胆道疼痛患者。纳入350例患者:85例接受安慰剂治疗,81例接受丙醇10mg治疗,91例接受丙醇20mg治疗,93例接受丙醇30mg治疗。治疗前、治疗后20、60、120 min分别采用视觉模拟和语言量表评估自发性疼痛强度。在所有的对照组中,所有的治疗都诱导了显著的渐进式疼痛减轻,但与安慰剂组相比,接受20和30毫克丙醇治疗的患者在120分钟后疼痛强度明显降低。最后一组对照显示,28%接受安慰剂治疗的患者无疼痛,而60%接受丙醇30 mg治疗的患者无疼痛,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。所有治疗的耐受性都很好,没有因不良事件而退出。口干是不良反应,发生的频率明显高于安慰剂,尽管只在服用20毫克和30毫克活性剂量的患者中出现。本研究结果表明丙炔醇是治疗中至重度胆源性绞痛的有效药物。在疗效和副作用方面,观察到明显的剂量-反应关系;20毫克和30毫克的剂量明显优于安慰剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信