Predicting RGP daily wear success.

K A Polse, A D Graham, R E Fusaro, C M Gan, R K Rivera, J S Chan, N A McNamara, T S Sanders
{"title":"Predicting RGP daily wear success.","authors":"K A Polse,&nbsp;A D Graham,&nbsp;R E Fusaro,&nbsp;C M Gan,&nbsp;R K Rivera,&nbsp;J S Chan,&nbsp;N A McNamara,&nbsp;T S Sanders","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While most clinicians agree that fitting of rigid gas permeable (RGP) lenses is the preferred treatment strategy for some types of patients, many patients have difficulty adapting to full-time daily wear of these lenses. The Contact Lens Extended Wear Study (CLEWS) is a randomized, controlled clinical trial in which subjects are first adapted to full-time RGP daily wear prior to randomization to either high or medium oxygen transmissibility (Dk/L) RGP lenses for 12 months of extended wear. The CLEWS pre-randomization data provide an opportunity to examine the reasons some patients fail to adapt to RGP daily wear and to determine whether a patient's demographic, historical, and ocular characteristics can be used to predict RGP daily wear success.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 1,809 individuals who expressed interest in RGP lenses, 411 subjects passed the CLEWS screening criteria and were fit with high Dk lenses (mean Dk = 92 x 10(-11) [cm2/sec][mL 02/mL x mmHg]). The fitting strategy included minimum apical alignment, lid attachment, centration, and average lens diameters of 9.2 mm. Success was defined as a minimum of 14 hours per day without adverse ocular responses that would contraindicate either full-day daily wear or extended wear.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 411 subjects, 286 (69.6%) were successful with RGP extended wear. Among the 125 failures, 50 were based on clinician findings (e.g., cornea, vision, compliance), while 75 subjects chose to discontinue wear because of unacceptable comfort or poor vision. Multivariate linear logistic regression modeling shows that younger patients with greater corneal curvature (K) and less predicted residual astigmatism have a higher probability of RGP daily wear success.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study showed that RGP lenses can be fit with a relatively high rate of success and that many of those patients who elect to discontinue RGP daily wear report unacceptable comfort as the primary reason. We propose a Bayesian statistical method that will assist clinicians in selecting those candidates for RGP daily wear who are most likely to adapt successfully.</p>","PeriodicalId":22367,"journal":{"name":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","volume":"25 3","pages":"152-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: While most clinicians agree that fitting of rigid gas permeable (RGP) lenses is the preferred treatment strategy for some types of patients, many patients have difficulty adapting to full-time daily wear of these lenses. The Contact Lens Extended Wear Study (CLEWS) is a randomized, controlled clinical trial in which subjects are first adapted to full-time RGP daily wear prior to randomization to either high or medium oxygen transmissibility (Dk/L) RGP lenses for 12 months of extended wear. The CLEWS pre-randomization data provide an opportunity to examine the reasons some patients fail to adapt to RGP daily wear and to determine whether a patient's demographic, historical, and ocular characteristics can be used to predict RGP daily wear success.

Methods: From 1,809 individuals who expressed interest in RGP lenses, 411 subjects passed the CLEWS screening criteria and were fit with high Dk lenses (mean Dk = 92 x 10(-11) [cm2/sec][mL 02/mL x mmHg]). The fitting strategy included minimum apical alignment, lid attachment, centration, and average lens diameters of 9.2 mm. Success was defined as a minimum of 14 hours per day without adverse ocular responses that would contraindicate either full-day daily wear or extended wear.

Results: Of the 411 subjects, 286 (69.6%) were successful with RGP extended wear. Among the 125 failures, 50 were based on clinician findings (e.g., cornea, vision, compliance), while 75 subjects chose to discontinue wear because of unacceptable comfort or poor vision. Multivariate linear logistic regression modeling shows that younger patients with greater corneal curvature (K) and less predicted residual astigmatism have a higher probability of RGP daily wear success.

Conclusions: Our study showed that RGP lenses can be fit with a relatively high rate of success and that many of those patients who elect to discontinue RGP daily wear report unacceptable comfort as the primary reason. We propose a Bayesian statistical method that will assist clinicians in selecting those candidates for RGP daily wear who are most likely to adapt successfully.

预测RGP日常佩戴成功。
目的:虽然大多数临床医生都认为硬透气(RGP)镜片是某些类型患者的首选治疗策略,但许多患者难以适应全天日常佩戴这些镜片。隐形眼镜长时间佩戴研究(CLEWS)是一项随机对照临床试验,受试者首先适应全天RGP日常佩戴,然后随机分配到高或中等氧传递率(Dk/L) RGP镜片12个月的长时间佩戴。CLEWS预随机化数据提供了一个机会来检查一些患者不适应RGP日常佩戴的原因,并确定患者的人口统计学、历史和眼部特征是否可以用来预测RGP日常佩戴的成功。方法:从1809名对RGP镜片感兴趣的个体中,411名通过CLEWS筛选标准,适合高Dk镜片(平均Dk = 92 x 10(-11) [cm2/sec][mL 02/mL x mmHg])。拟合策略包括最小的晶状体尖对准、眼睑附着、集中和平均晶状体直径9.2 mm。成功的定义是每天至少使用14小时,无不良的眼部反应,禁止全天佩戴或长时间佩戴。结果:411例患者中,286例(69.6%)患者RGP延长磨损成功。在125例失败中,50例是基于临床医生的发现(如角膜、视力、依从性),而75例是由于无法接受的舒适或视力不佳而选择停止佩戴。多元线性logistic回归模型显示,角膜曲率(K)较大、预测残余散光较小的年轻患者每日佩戴RGP的成功率较高。结论:我们的研究表明,RGP镜片的配戴成功率相对较高,许多选择停止日常佩戴RGP的患者报告称,无法接受的舒适性是主要原因。我们提出了一种贝叶斯统计方法,该方法将帮助临床医生选择那些最有可能成功适应RGP日常佩戴的候选人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信