The prognostic value of electrocochleography in severely hearing-impaired infants.

R Schoonhoven, P J Lamoré, J A de Laat, J J Grote
{"title":"The prognostic value of electrocochleography in severely hearing-impaired infants.","authors":"R Schoonhoven,&nbsp;P J Lamoré,&nbsp;J A de Laat,&nbsp;J J Grote","doi":"10.3109/00206099909073016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper presents a longitudinal evaluation of electrocochleographic assessment in severely hearing-impaired infants. Electrophysiological data were obtained by transtympanic electrocochleography to tone-burst stimuli at octave frequencies of 500 to 8000 Hz at the age of 0-6 years in a group of 126 subjects. The results are compared with auditory thresholds determined at school age in the same children by means of pure-tone audiometry. Cochlear microphonics could be recorded in virtually all ears, although the majority of subjects had hearing losses of 90 dB and more. Compound action potentials (CAPs) showed waveforms varying from normal to a wide range of abnormalities. Audiometric thresholds correlated generally well with the compound action potential (CAP) thresholds obtained in infancy. The error in the predicted audiometric thresholds is between 15 and 20 dB, as compared with 11 dB reported for more moderate hearing losses. It is shown that, in spite of the high stimulus levels used, substantial frequency-specific threshold information is retained. Occasional large discrepancies in thresholds were often associated with markedly abnormal response waveforms. Among the many cases in which no ABR could be elicited, 68 per cent produced detectable electrocochleographic responses in the 1000-4000 Hz range. It is concluded that electrocochleography is a valuable method for the assessment of residual hearing in infants suspected of having a severe hearing impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":75571,"journal":{"name":"Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology","volume":"38 3","pages":"141-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00206099909073016","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/00206099909073016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

This paper presents a longitudinal evaluation of electrocochleographic assessment in severely hearing-impaired infants. Electrophysiological data were obtained by transtympanic electrocochleography to tone-burst stimuli at octave frequencies of 500 to 8000 Hz at the age of 0-6 years in a group of 126 subjects. The results are compared with auditory thresholds determined at school age in the same children by means of pure-tone audiometry. Cochlear microphonics could be recorded in virtually all ears, although the majority of subjects had hearing losses of 90 dB and more. Compound action potentials (CAPs) showed waveforms varying from normal to a wide range of abnormalities. Audiometric thresholds correlated generally well with the compound action potential (CAP) thresholds obtained in infancy. The error in the predicted audiometric thresholds is between 15 and 20 dB, as compared with 11 dB reported for more moderate hearing losses. It is shown that, in spite of the high stimulus levels used, substantial frequency-specific threshold information is retained. Occasional large discrepancies in thresholds were often associated with markedly abnormal response waveforms. Among the many cases in which no ABR could be elicited, 68 per cent produced detectable electrocochleographic responses in the 1000-4000 Hz range. It is concluded that electrocochleography is a valuable method for the assessment of residual hearing in infants suspected of having a severe hearing impairment.

耳蜗电图对重度听障婴儿的预后价值。
本文对重度听障婴儿的耳蜗电评进行了纵向评价。对126名0 ~ 6岁儿童进行500 ~ 8000hz频率的音爆刺激,采用经鼓室电耳蜗图获得电生理数据。将结果与同一儿童在学龄期通过纯音听力学测定的听觉阈值进行比较。尽管大多数受试者的听力损失在90分贝以上,但几乎所有的耳朵都能记录到人工耳蜗微音。复合动作电位(CAPs)表现出从正常到广泛异常的波形变化。听力阈值与婴儿期获得的复合动作电位(CAP)阈值普遍具有良好的相关性。预测听力阈值的误差在15到20分贝之间,而较中度听力损失的报告误差为11分贝。结果表明,尽管使用了高刺激水平,但仍保留了大量特定频率的阈值信息。阈值的偶尔大差异常与明显异常的响应波形有关。在许多不能引起ABR的病例中,68%的病例在1000-4000赫兹范围内产生可检测的耳蜗电反应。结论:对于怀疑有严重听力障碍的婴儿,耳蜗电描记是一种有价值的评估残余听力的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信