Effect of signal duration on categorical loudness scaling in normal and in hearing-impaired listeners.

S Garnier, C Micheyl, C Berger-Vachon, L Collet
{"title":"Effect of signal duration on categorical loudness scaling in normal and in hearing-impaired listeners.","authors":"S Garnier,&nbsp;C Micheyl,&nbsp;C Berger-Vachon,&nbsp;L Collet","doi":"10.3109/00206099909073023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study sought to determine whether the duration of white-noise bursts affects their loudness category rating in the same way for hearing-impaired as for normally-hearing subjects. Twelve normally-hearing and 12 hearing-impaired subjects took part. Categorical loudness growth functions were obtained for 16.25 ms, 32.5 ms, 75 ms, 150 ms and 300 ms white noise bursts. Temporal integration of loudness was defined as the intensity difference needed for stimuli of different durations to result in identical category ratings. In normally-hearing subjects, temporal integration of loudness occurred mainly with the short-duration (16.25 ms and 32.5 ms) stimuli, whereas it was found with almost every stimulus duration in hearing-impaired subjects. In other words, temporal integration of loudness between 16.25 ms and 300 ms stimulus duration was greater in hearing-impaired listeners and there was a difference between normal and hearing-impaired subjects regarding change in loudness perception with stimulus duration. Consequently, the use of fixed-duration stimuli hinders loudness normalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":75571,"journal":{"name":"Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology","volume":"38 4","pages":"196-201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00206099909073023","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/00206099909073023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The present study sought to determine whether the duration of white-noise bursts affects their loudness category rating in the same way for hearing-impaired as for normally-hearing subjects. Twelve normally-hearing and 12 hearing-impaired subjects took part. Categorical loudness growth functions were obtained for 16.25 ms, 32.5 ms, 75 ms, 150 ms and 300 ms white noise bursts. Temporal integration of loudness was defined as the intensity difference needed for stimuli of different durations to result in identical category ratings. In normally-hearing subjects, temporal integration of loudness occurred mainly with the short-duration (16.25 ms and 32.5 ms) stimuli, whereas it was found with almost every stimulus duration in hearing-impaired subjects. In other words, temporal integration of loudness between 16.25 ms and 300 ms stimulus duration was greater in hearing-impaired listeners and there was a difference between normal and hearing-impaired subjects regarding change in loudness perception with stimulus duration. Consequently, the use of fixed-duration stimuli hinders loudness normalization.

信号持续时间对正常和听障听者响度分级的影响。
目前的研究试图确定白噪音爆发的持续时间对听力受损者和听力正常者的响度类别评级的影响是否相同。12名听力正常和12名听力受损的受试者参与了研究。分别获得了16.25 ms、32.5 ms、75 ms、150 ms和300 ms白噪声的响度增长函数。响度的时间整合被定义为不同持续时间的刺激产生相同类别评级所需的强度差异。在听力正常的受试者中,响度的时间整合主要发生在短时间刺激(16.25 ms和32.5 ms),而在听力受损的受试者中,响度的时间整合几乎在所有刺激时间中都存在。也就是说,在刺激持续时间16.25 ms和300 ms之间,听力受损者的响度时间整合更大,而正常和听力受损者的响度感知随刺激持续时间的变化存在差异。因此,固定时间刺激的使用阻碍了响度的正常化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信