Reimbursement to advanced practice nurses (APNs) through Medicare.

S T Wong
{"title":"Reimbursement to advanced practice nurses (APNs) through Medicare.","authors":"S T Wong","doi":"10.1111/j.1547-5069.1999.tb00462.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze why U.S. legislation for direct Medicare reimbursement to advanced practice nurses (APNs) was approved during the 105th congressional session. Help in understanding the complexities of policy making and in strategizing future policy activities is needed. Given their vast numbers, nurses are a formidable group with potential to influence policy.</p><p><strong>Organizing construct: </strong>Kingdon's (1995) framework indicates that policy formation involves constant interaction among participants and the problem, its politics, and policy. When a policy is enacted into legislation, the three come together and an opportunity for policy formation exists, if even for a short period. Methods for data extraction included telephone interviews, information provided by the American Nurses Association (ANA), and information from the internet to access information.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Lack of access to health care by Medicare beneficiaries, tagging a policy proposal onto the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, the national mood to provide cost-effective quality care, and lobbying by interest groups helped to make direct Medicare reimbursement for advanced practice nurses a reality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When lobbying for the enactment of legislation, nurses should decrease their tendency to fragment. Nurses should be more effectively organized and concentrate on specific agendas. Working together can influence policy and change clinical situations to improve patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":77169,"journal":{"name":"Image--the journal of nursing scholarship","volume":"31 2","pages":"167-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1999.tb00462.x","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Image--the journal of nursing scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1999.tb00462.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze why U.S. legislation for direct Medicare reimbursement to advanced practice nurses (APNs) was approved during the 105th congressional session. Help in understanding the complexities of policy making and in strategizing future policy activities is needed. Given their vast numbers, nurses are a formidable group with potential to influence policy.

Organizing construct: Kingdon's (1995) framework indicates that policy formation involves constant interaction among participants and the problem, its politics, and policy. When a policy is enacted into legislation, the three come together and an opportunity for policy formation exists, if even for a short period. Methods for data extraction included telephone interviews, information provided by the American Nurses Association (ANA), and information from the internet to access information.

Findings: Lack of access to health care by Medicare beneficiaries, tagging a policy proposal onto the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, the national mood to provide cost-effective quality care, and lobbying by interest groups helped to make direct Medicare reimbursement for advanced practice nurses a reality.

Conclusions: When lobbying for the enactment of legislation, nurses should decrease their tendency to fragment. Nurses should be more effectively organized and concentrate on specific agendas. Working together can influence policy and change clinical situations to improve patient care.

通过医疗保险向高级执业护士(apn)报销。
目的:分析美国第105届国会批准对高级执业护士(apn)直接医疗保险报销立法的原因。需要帮助理解政策制定的复杂性和为未来的政策活动制定战略。鉴于人数众多,护士是一个强大的群体,具有影响政策的潜力。组织结构:Kingdon(1995)的框架表明,政策形成涉及参与者与问题、政治和政策之间的持续互动。当一项政策被制定为立法时,这三者结合在一起,形成政策的机会就存在了,即使是在很短的时间内。数据提取方法包括电话访谈、美国护士协会(ANA)提供的资料和通过互联网获取的资料。研究结果:医疗保险受益人缺乏获得医疗保健的机会,将一项政策提案列入1997年平衡预算法案,提供具有成本效益的高质量医疗服务的全国情绪,以及利益集团的游说,帮助实现了对高级执业护士的直接医疗保险报销。结论:护士在游说立法时应减少碎片化倾向。护士应该更有效地组织起来,专注于具体的议程。共同努力可以影响政策和改变临床情况,以改善患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信