What the role of the modern ED should be.

B A Fisher
{"title":"What the role of the modern ED should be.","authors":"B A Fisher","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Managed care organizations (MCOs) have recently focused on the high cost per patient visit in the Emergency Department (ED). MCOs emphasize preventing low acuity patients access to the ED, believing that billions of healthcare dollars will be saved. However, a review of emergency department studies suggests a different outcome. Combined with new ED service lines, perhaps another, rather paradoxical approach to managing healthcare costs in the ED is more patient focused and more cost-effective long-term. This approach is more comprehensive and offers more services, not less. The ED is an important community resource and entry port to healthcare. It is the only place open 24-hours per day, 7 days per week with no appointment necessary, and all lab and radiology services available. The very claim that it is \"overutilized\" is an indication of its success. In large volume EDs, certain patient populations may be more specifically served with pediatric emergency, industrial medicine, and fast track physicians. Special facilities for chest pain patients or observation can treat patients more quickly, keep them out of hospital beds, thus lowering costs. In smaller hospitals, the well rounded ED physician can treat patients of all acuities. In the most rural communities the ED can become the local 24-hour clinic with short-term stay beds. EDs are fixed costs to hospitals. Extracting low acuity patients from the ED will raise costs for emergency patients and leave the facility underutilized. By appropriately raising prices for emergencies and decreasing low acuity patient charges to reflect marginal expense, the ED becomes a cost friendly environment for the low acuity patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":79858,"journal":{"name":"Cost & quality quarterly journal : CQ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cost & quality quarterly journal : CQ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Managed care organizations (MCOs) have recently focused on the high cost per patient visit in the Emergency Department (ED). MCOs emphasize preventing low acuity patients access to the ED, believing that billions of healthcare dollars will be saved. However, a review of emergency department studies suggests a different outcome. Combined with new ED service lines, perhaps another, rather paradoxical approach to managing healthcare costs in the ED is more patient focused and more cost-effective long-term. This approach is more comprehensive and offers more services, not less. The ED is an important community resource and entry port to healthcare. It is the only place open 24-hours per day, 7 days per week with no appointment necessary, and all lab and radiology services available. The very claim that it is "overutilized" is an indication of its success. In large volume EDs, certain patient populations may be more specifically served with pediatric emergency, industrial medicine, and fast track physicians. Special facilities for chest pain patients or observation can treat patients more quickly, keep them out of hospital beds, thus lowering costs. In smaller hospitals, the well rounded ED physician can treat patients of all acuities. In the most rural communities the ED can become the local 24-hour clinic with short-term stay beds. EDs are fixed costs to hospitals. Extracting low acuity patients from the ED will raise costs for emergency patients and leave the facility underutilized. By appropriately raising prices for emergencies and decreasing low acuity patient charges to reflect marginal expense, the ED becomes a cost friendly environment for the low acuity patient.

现代ED的角色应该是什么?
管理式医疗组织(MCOs)最近关注的是急诊部(ED)每位患者就诊的高成本。mco强调防止低视力患者进入急诊科,相信这将节省数十亿美元的医疗保健费用。然而,对急诊科研究的回顾显示了不同的结果。结合新的急诊科服务线,也许另一种管理急诊科医疗保健成本的方法是更以患者为中心,更具有长期成本效益。这种方法更全面,提供的服务更多,而不是更少。急诊科是一种重要的社区资源和医疗服务的入口。这是唯一一个每周7天,每天24小时开放,无需预约的地方,并提供所有实验室和放射服务。它被“过度利用”的说法本身就表明了它的成功。在大容量的急诊科,某些患者群体可能更具体地由儿科急诊、工业医学和快速通道医生服务。针对胸痛患者的特殊设施或观察可以更快地治疗患者,使他们远离病床,从而降低成本。在较小的医院,全面的急诊科医生可以治疗所有视力的病人。在大多数农村社区,急诊科可以成为当地24小时门诊,提供短期住院床位。急诊是医院的固定费用。从急诊科抽调低视力患者将增加急诊患者的费用,并使该设施未得到充分利用。通过适当提高急诊价格,降低低视力患者收费以反映边际费用,急诊科成为低视力患者的成本友好型环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信