A quality management approach to optimizing delivery and administration of preoperative antibiotics.

L Welch, A C Teague, B A Knight, A Kenney, J E Hernandez
{"title":"A quality management approach to optimizing delivery and administration of preoperative antibiotics.","authors":"L Welch,&nbsp;A C Teague,&nbsp;B A Knight,&nbsp;A Kenney,&nbsp;J E Hernandez","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To optimize the process for delivering and administering preoperative antibiotics in order to prevent potential adverse patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Using a multidisciplinary quality-improvement team, an evaluation of the preoperative medication order and delivery process was conducted. Charts were reviewed by selected time periods, with winter 1994 discharges for orthopedic surgeries (n = 97) and spring 1995 discharges for open heart procedures (n = 50) being used to arrive at baseline data (n = 147). A plan was devised to mainstream the medication-use process so that it would be standardized hospitalwide. A goal of administering preoperative antibiotics within 30 to 60 minutes prior to cut time was established. Following redesign and education, a repeat chart review of orthopedic surgeries (n = 33) and open heart procedures (n = 168) was conducted during April 1997 for discharges from the same diagnosis-related groups to total (n = 201).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A nearly 1,000-bed tertiary referral center and teaching hospital with three separate campuses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified multiple ordering mechanisms, multiple medication sources and delivery sites, multiple administration sites and administering personnel, and other logistical conflicts. Thirty-one percent of cases received antibiotics less than 30 minutes prior to start time, 39% between 30 to 60 minutes, and 30% greater than 60 minutes before start time. Following the multidisciplinary redesign and education, an increase from 39% to 61% receiving preoperative antibiotics between 30 to 60 minutes prior to surgery start time and a decrease from 31% to 18% receiving them in less than 30 minutes was documented. The percentage of patients receiving preoperative antibiotics in 60 minutes or less increased from 70% to 80%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A continuous quality-improvement approach that engages all departments involved in patient care is necessary to achieve meaningful change in complicated hospital processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":79831,"journal":{"name":"Clinical performance and quality health care","volume":"6 4","pages":"168-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical performance and quality health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To optimize the process for delivering and administering preoperative antibiotics in order to prevent potential adverse patient outcomes.

Design: Using a multidisciplinary quality-improvement team, an evaluation of the preoperative medication order and delivery process was conducted. Charts were reviewed by selected time periods, with winter 1994 discharges for orthopedic surgeries (n = 97) and spring 1995 discharges for open heart procedures (n = 50) being used to arrive at baseline data (n = 147). A plan was devised to mainstream the medication-use process so that it would be standardized hospitalwide. A goal of administering preoperative antibiotics within 30 to 60 minutes prior to cut time was established. Following redesign and education, a repeat chart review of orthopedic surgeries (n = 33) and open heart procedures (n = 168) was conducted during April 1997 for discharges from the same diagnosis-related groups to total (n = 201).

Setting: A nearly 1,000-bed tertiary referral center and teaching hospital with three separate campuses.

Results: We identified multiple ordering mechanisms, multiple medication sources and delivery sites, multiple administration sites and administering personnel, and other logistical conflicts. Thirty-one percent of cases received antibiotics less than 30 minutes prior to start time, 39% between 30 to 60 minutes, and 30% greater than 60 minutes before start time. Following the multidisciplinary redesign and education, an increase from 39% to 61% receiving preoperative antibiotics between 30 to 60 minutes prior to surgery start time and a decrease from 31% to 18% receiving them in less than 30 minutes was documented. The percentage of patients receiving preoperative antibiotics in 60 minutes or less increased from 70% to 80%.

Conclusion: A continuous quality-improvement approach that engages all departments involved in patient care is necessary to achieve meaningful change in complicated hospital processes.

优化术前抗生素交付和管理的质量管理方法。
目的:优化术前抗生素的交付和使用流程,以预防潜在的不良患者预后。设计:采用多学科质量改进小组,对术前用药顺序和给药过程进行评估。按选定的时间段审查图表,使用1994年冬季骨科手术出院病例(n = 97)和1995年春季心脏直视手术出院病例(n = 50)来获得基线数据(n = 147)。制定了一项计划,将药物使用过程纳入主流,以便在整个医院范围内标准化。目标是在切割时间前30至60分钟内给予术前抗生素。在重新设计和教育之后,1997年4月对同一诊断相关组的出院患者(n = 201)进行了骨科手术(n = 33)和心内直视手术(n = 168)的重复图表回顾。环境:拥有近1000个床位的三级转诊中心和教学医院,设有三个独立的校区。结果:我们发现了多个订购机制、多个药物来源和递送地点、多个给药地点和管理人员以及其他后勤冲突。31%的病例在开始时间前不到30分钟接受抗生素治疗,39%在开始时间前30至60分钟接受抗生素治疗,30%在开始时间前60分钟接受抗生素治疗。经过多学科的重新设计和教育,在手术开始前30至60分钟接受术前抗生素治疗的比例从39%增加到61%,在不到30分钟内接受抗生素治疗的比例从31%下降到18%。术前60分钟或更短时间内接受抗生素治疗的患者比例从70%增加到80%。结论:在复杂的医院流程中实现有意义的变革,必须采取持续的质量改进方法,使所有参与患者护理的部门都参与进来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信