Red blood cell transfusions for elective hip and knee arthroplasty: opportunity to improve quality of care and documentation.

S S Cook, C B Cangialose, D M Sieburg, S M Kieszak, R Boudreau, L H Hoffman, K S Elward, D J Ballard
{"title":"Red blood cell transfusions for elective hip and knee arthroplasty: opportunity to improve quality of care and documentation.","authors":"S S Cook,&nbsp;C B Cangialose,&nbsp;D M Sieburg,&nbsp;S M Kieszak,&nbsp;R Boudreau,&nbsp;L H Hoffman,&nbsp;K S Elward,&nbsp;D J Ballard","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess current practice for red blood cell transfusion relative to the American College of Physicians guideline for red blood cell transfusion; to determine comparative rates and relative appropriateness of autologous versus allogeneic blood use; and, to assess cost implications of current transfusion practices.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Computerized quality-of-care algorithm applied retrospectively to medical-record and blood-bank data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Twenty-six hospitals in Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Oklahoma, and Virginia.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Medicare beneficiaries (2,137) who were hospitalized in 1993 for two elective surgical procedures: total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty. Of the 1,195 patients who received a preoperative or postoperative transfusion, 728 were excluded from the analysis because the hospital medical record did not contain the clinical documentation necessary to apply the American College of Physicians guideline to each unit transfused. The remaining 467 patients comprised the sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For 467 patients who underwent these two procedures and received a total of 651 units of preoperative or postoperative blood, there were 256 excess units transfused. Two hundred four of these units were autologous, and 52 were allogeneic. These excess units accounted for $48,200 of the total $121,000 direct cost of transfused units.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings demonstrate that current medical records lack the documentation necessary to evaluate transfusion practice for the majority of Medicare beneficiaries undergoing elective hip and knee arthroplasty. The direct costs of preoperative and postoperative blood transfusion for these two procedures could be reduced by nearly 40% through adherence to the American College of Physicians guideline. The majority of this cost saving would be realized through reduction in unnecessary collection and use of autologous blood.</p>","PeriodicalId":79831,"journal":{"name":"Clinical performance and quality health care","volume":"7 1","pages":"5-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical performance and quality health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess current practice for red blood cell transfusion relative to the American College of Physicians guideline for red blood cell transfusion; to determine comparative rates and relative appropriateness of autologous versus allogeneic blood use; and, to assess cost implications of current transfusion practices.

Design: Computerized quality-of-care algorithm applied retrospectively to medical-record and blood-bank data.

Setting: Twenty-six hospitals in Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Oklahoma, and Virginia.

Patients: Medicare beneficiaries (2,137) who were hospitalized in 1993 for two elective surgical procedures: total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty. Of the 1,195 patients who received a preoperative or postoperative transfusion, 728 were excluded from the analysis because the hospital medical record did not contain the clinical documentation necessary to apply the American College of Physicians guideline to each unit transfused. The remaining 467 patients comprised the sample.

Results: For 467 patients who underwent these two procedures and received a total of 651 units of preoperative or postoperative blood, there were 256 excess units transfused. Two hundred four of these units were autologous, and 52 were allogeneic. These excess units accounted for $48,200 of the total $121,000 direct cost of transfused units.

Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that current medical records lack the documentation necessary to evaluate transfusion practice for the majority of Medicare beneficiaries undergoing elective hip and knee arthroplasty. The direct costs of preoperative and postoperative blood transfusion for these two procedures could be reduced by nearly 40% through adherence to the American College of Physicians guideline. The majority of this cost saving would be realized through reduction in unnecessary collection and use of autologous blood.

选择性髋关节和膝关节置换术中的红细胞输注:提高护理质量和文献记录的机会。
目的:相对于美国医师学会红细胞输血指南,评估目前红细胞输血的做法;确定自体与异体血液使用的比较率和相对适宜性;并评估当前输血做法的成本影响。设计:计算机化护理质量算法回顾性应用于医疗记录和血库数据。地点:科罗拉多州、康涅狄格州、佐治亚州、俄克拉何马州和弗吉尼亚州的26家医院。患者:医疗保险受益人(2,137人),1993年住院接受两种选择性手术:全髋关节置换术和全膝关节置换术。在接受术前或术后输血的1195例患者中,有728例被排除在分析之外,因为医院病历不包含将美国医师学会指南应用于每单位输血所需的临床文件。剩下的467名患者构成了样本。结果:467例患者接受了这两种手术,术前或术后总共接受了651单位的血液,其中有256个多余单位的输血。其中244个单位是自体的,52个是异体的。在输血单位直接费用总额121 000美元中,这些超额单位占48 200美元。结论:这些发现表明,目前的医疗记录缺乏必要的文件来评估大多数接受选择性髋关节和膝关节置换术的医疗保险受益人的输血实践。通过遵守美国医师学会的指导方针,这两种手术的术前和术后输血的直接费用可以减少近40%。节省的大部分费用将通过减少不必要的采集和使用自体血液来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信