D G Dumigan, C A Kohan, C R Reed, J F Jekel, M K Fikrig
{"title":"Utilizing national nosocomial infection surveillance system data to improve urinary tract infection rates in three intensive-care units.","authors":"D G Dumigan, C A Kohan, C R Reed, J F Jekel, M K Fikrig","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To reduce catheter-related urinary tract infection rates in three intensive-care units to at or below the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System pooled mean for similar units.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A nursing team, physician team, and laboratory team reviewed and revised protocols and procedures for better catheter management.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A 500-bed community teaching hospital.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The teams developed medical indications for urinary catheter placement and criteria that allowed the registered nurse to remove a catheter without a physician's order when no longer medically necessary. They created a computer prompt to assure a urinalysis accompanied all urine cultures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After introducing the new protocols, the incidence density of catheter-related urinary tract infections fell 17% in the surgical intensive-care unit, 29% in the medical intensive-care acute unit, and 45% in the coronary intensive-care acute unit. The registered nurses' compliance in removing the catheter per protocol was 88%. Physician ordering of a concomitant urinalysis with each urine culture achieved 93%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A multidisciplinary approach assisted in reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections in three intensive-care units, although not to the extent desired. The teams are investigating preconnected and antimicrobial-coated catheters further.</p>","PeriodicalId":79831,"journal":{"name":"Clinical performance and quality health care","volume":"6 4","pages":"172-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical performance and quality health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To reduce catheter-related urinary tract infection rates in three intensive-care units to at or below the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System pooled mean for similar units.
Design: A nursing team, physician team, and laboratory team reviewed and revised protocols and procedures for better catheter management.
Setting: A 500-bed community teaching hospital.
Interventions: The teams developed medical indications for urinary catheter placement and criteria that allowed the registered nurse to remove a catheter without a physician's order when no longer medically necessary. They created a computer prompt to assure a urinalysis accompanied all urine cultures.
Results: After introducing the new protocols, the incidence density of catheter-related urinary tract infections fell 17% in the surgical intensive-care unit, 29% in the medical intensive-care acute unit, and 45% in the coronary intensive-care acute unit. The registered nurses' compliance in removing the catheter per protocol was 88%. Physician ordering of a concomitant urinalysis with each urine culture achieved 93%.
Conclusions: A multidisciplinary approach assisted in reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections in three intensive-care units, although not to the extent desired. The teams are investigating preconnected and antimicrobial-coated catheters further.