Quality improvement in an integrated urban healthcare system: a necessary journey.

M P Earnest, S M Grimm, M A Malmgren, B A Martin, M Meehan, M B Potter, A W Steele, J R Zocholl
{"title":"Quality improvement in an integrated urban healthcare system: a necessary journey.","authors":"M P Earnest,&nbsp;S M Grimm,&nbsp;M A Malmgren,&nbsp;B A Martin,&nbsp;M Meehan,&nbsp;M B Potter,&nbsp;A W Steele,&nbsp;J R Zocholl","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Public hospitals and clinics in the United States provide health care for the needs of large numbers of people who are medically indigent, homeless, chronically mentally ill, and suffer medical and social disorders associated with poverty. These \"safety-net\" healthcare providers traditionally struggle with barriers to providing high-quality, patient-sensitive care, including decaying physical facilities, burdensome bureaucracies, underfunded capital equipment and construction programs, and complex, politically driven budgets and governance. However, these same institutions now must compete for their own Medicaid and Medicare clientele because the private sector is marketing to those patients. They also must continue to provide increasing services to growing numbers of uninsured patients. To accomplish this, these institutions must reinvent themselves as patient-focused, high-quality, cost-effective healthcare providers. The Denver Health system is the public safety-net provider for the city and county of Denver. This large public institution has instituted a multifaceted performance-improvement program. The program includes training employees for patient-focused service, implementing continuous quality-improvement practices, instituting clinical pathways, revising the preexisting ambulatory quality-management program, reengineering key aspects of ambulatory clinic services, and redesigning the hospital-based patient-care services. Major successes have been achieved in some initiatives, but not in all. Many key \"lessons learned\" may guide others.</p>","PeriodicalId":79831,"journal":{"name":"Clinical performance and quality health care","volume":"6 4","pages":"193-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical performance and quality health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public hospitals and clinics in the United States provide health care for the needs of large numbers of people who are medically indigent, homeless, chronically mentally ill, and suffer medical and social disorders associated with poverty. These "safety-net" healthcare providers traditionally struggle with barriers to providing high-quality, patient-sensitive care, including decaying physical facilities, burdensome bureaucracies, underfunded capital equipment and construction programs, and complex, politically driven budgets and governance. However, these same institutions now must compete for their own Medicaid and Medicare clientele because the private sector is marketing to those patients. They also must continue to provide increasing services to growing numbers of uninsured patients. To accomplish this, these institutions must reinvent themselves as patient-focused, high-quality, cost-effective healthcare providers. The Denver Health system is the public safety-net provider for the city and county of Denver. This large public institution has instituted a multifaceted performance-improvement program. The program includes training employees for patient-focused service, implementing continuous quality-improvement practices, instituting clinical pathways, revising the preexisting ambulatory quality-management program, reengineering key aspects of ambulatory clinic services, and redesigning the hospital-based patient-care services. Major successes have been achieved in some initiatives, but not in all. Many key "lessons learned" may guide others.

城市综合医疗体系的质量提升:必经之路。
美国的公立医院和诊所为大量医疗贫困、无家可归、患有慢性精神病以及患有与贫困有关的医疗和社会障碍的人提供医疗保健服务。传统上,这些“安全网”医疗保健提供者在提供高质量、对患者敏感的护理方面面临着诸多障碍,包括陈旧的物理设施、繁琐的官僚机构、资金不足的资本设备和建设项目,以及复杂的、受政治驱动的预算和治理。然而,这些机构现在必须为自己的医疗补助和医疗保险客户竞争,因为私营部门正在向这些患者推销。他们还必须继续为越来越多的没有保险的病人提供越来越多的服务。为了实现这一目标,这些机构必须将自己重塑为以患者为中心、高质量、高成本效益的医疗保健提供者。丹佛卫生系统是丹佛市和县的公共安全网提供者。这个大型公共机构制定了一项多方面的绩效改进计划。该方案包括对员工进行以病人为中心的服务培训,实施持续的质量改进做法,建立临床途径,修订现有的门诊质量管理方案,重新设计门诊服务的关键方面,以及重新设计以医院为基础的病人护理服务。一些倡议取得了重大成功,但并非全部。许多关键的“经验教训”可能会指导其他人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信