Comparison of tear lactate dehydrogenase activities of different types of contact lens wearers and normal control group.

G Iskeleli, Y Karakoc, B Akdeniz-Kayhan, U Kayhan, B Gurler, S Ozkan
{"title":"Comparison of tear lactate dehydrogenase activities of different types of contact lens wearers and normal control group.","authors":"G Iskeleli,&nbsp;Y Karakoc,&nbsp;B Akdeniz-Kayhan,&nbsp;U Kayhan,&nbsp;B Gurler,&nbsp;S Ozkan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activities in the tears of patients wearing different types of contact lenses with each other and to individuals who have never worn contact lenses (controls).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Tear LDH activities were determined in 13 normal subjects who had never worn contact lenses, 12 daily wear and ten extended wear soft contact lens wearers, and 14 daily wear and eight extended wear rigid gas permeable (RGP) contact lens wearers(Dk125). Tear samples were collected from all subjects at the same time of day from the inferior meniscus by using a microcapillary tube. The measurements were determined using a Sigma diagnostic LDH reagent and a spectrophotometer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference in the LDH activities between soft and RGP contact lenses--used either as daily or extended wear--when compared with each other. However, individuals wearing extended wear soft contact lenses had significantly higher tear LDH activities than the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tear LDH activity may be a useful method in evaluating the physiologic response of extended soft contact lens wear.</p>","PeriodicalId":22367,"journal":{"name":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","volume":"25 2","pages":"101-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activities in the tears of patients wearing different types of contact lenses with each other and to individuals who have never worn contact lenses (controls).

Methods: Tear LDH activities were determined in 13 normal subjects who had never worn contact lenses, 12 daily wear and ten extended wear soft contact lens wearers, and 14 daily wear and eight extended wear rigid gas permeable (RGP) contact lens wearers(Dk125). Tear samples were collected from all subjects at the same time of day from the inferior meniscus by using a microcapillary tube. The measurements were determined using a Sigma diagnostic LDH reagent and a spectrophotometer.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the LDH activities between soft and RGP contact lenses--used either as daily or extended wear--when compared with each other. However, individuals wearing extended wear soft contact lenses had significantly higher tear LDH activities than the control group.

Conclusion: Tear LDH activity may be a useful method in evaluating the physiologic response of extended soft contact lens wear.

不同类型隐形眼镜佩戴者与正常对照组泪液乳酸脱氢酶活性比较。
目的:本研究的目的是比较佩戴不同类型隐形眼镜的患者和从未佩戴过隐形眼镜的人(对照组)泪液中乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)的活性。方法:对13例未配戴隐形眼镜的正常人、12例日常配戴和10例延长配戴软性隐形眼镜者、14例日常配戴和8例延长配戴硬质透气性(RGP)隐形眼镜者(Dk125)的泪液LDH活性进行测定。使用微毛细管于每天同一时间从所有受试者的下半月板处采集泪液样本。使用Sigma诊断LDH试剂和分光光度计测定测量值。结果:无论是日常佩戴还是长时间佩戴,软性隐形眼镜和RGP隐形眼镜之间的LDH活性没有统计学上的显著差异。然而,佩戴长时间佩戴软性隐形眼镜的人的泪液LDH活性明显高于对照组。结论:泪液LDH活性可作为评价延长软性隐形眼镜佩戴后生理反应的一种有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信