Evidence-based esthetic dentistry.

R Niederman, M Ferguson, R Urdaneta, R Badovinac, D Christie, M Tantraphol, F Rasool
{"title":"Evidence-based esthetic dentistry.","authors":"R Niederman,&nbsp;M Ferguson,&nbsp;R Urdaneta,&nbsp;R Badovinac,&nbsp;D Christie,&nbsp;M Tantraphol,&nbsp;F Rasool","doi":"10.1111/j.1708-8240.1998.tb00363.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence-based clinical practice integrates the best available evidence with clinical expertise. This article presents a clinical case scenario and, using a four-step, evidence-based approach, demonstrates how to (1) ask an evidence-based question; (2) search MEDLINE for the best evidence; (3) critically appraise the evidence; and (4) apply the evidence to the patient. The procedure is demonstrated with the sample question, Does bleaching of bonded porcelain veneers increase marginal leakage? A MEDLINE search strategy was developed for synonyms of the key words that best identify the problem, the intervention, and the outcome. The synonyms were combined using the Boolean operator \"or\" to identify a \"sensitive\" (i.e., inclusive) universe of 140,000 journal articles. These categories were then combined using the Boolean operator \"and\" to identify the most \"specific\" (i.e., exclusive) four articles from among the 140,000. Finally, to find the best evidence, the articles were limited to \"humans\" and \"randomized controlled trials.\" This identified one article. Critical appraisal of the limited data in this one article indicates that the methods are valid and statistically significant, but because of the methods employed, may not be clinically important. Evidence-based methods take one to the edge of the available information universe in about 15 minutes. The results can be both exhilarating and sobering. They can indicate the depth or limits of available information and suggest gaps in the knowledge-base that require further study. Most importantly, however, the results allow practitioners to communicate incisively and truthfully with patients and to make more informed clinical choices.</p>","PeriodicalId":77204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of esthetic dentistry","volume":"10 5","pages":"229-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1998.tb00363.x","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of esthetic dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1998.tb00363.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Evidence-based clinical practice integrates the best available evidence with clinical expertise. This article presents a clinical case scenario and, using a four-step, evidence-based approach, demonstrates how to (1) ask an evidence-based question; (2) search MEDLINE for the best evidence; (3) critically appraise the evidence; and (4) apply the evidence to the patient. The procedure is demonstrated with the sample question, Does bleaching of bonded porcelain veneers increase marginal leakage? A MEDLINE search strategy was developed for synonyms of the key words that best identify the problem, the intervention, and the outcome. The synonyms were combined using the Boolean operator "or" to identify a "sensitive" (i.e., inclusive) universe of 140,000 journal articles. These categories were then combined using the Boolean operator "and" to identify the most "specific" (i.e., exclusive) four articles from among the 140,000. Finally, to find the best evidence, the articles were limited to "humans" and "randomized controlled trials." This identified one article. Critical appraisal of the limited data in this one article indicates that the methods are valid and statistically significant, but because of the methods employed, may not be clinically important. Evidence-based methods take one to the edge of the available information universe in about 15 minutes. The results can be both exhilarating and sobering. They can indicate the depth or limits of available information and suggest gaps in the knowledge-base that require further study. Most importantly, however, the results allow practitioners to communicate incisively and truthfully with patients and to make more informed clinical choices.

循证美学牙科。
循证临床实践将现有的最佳证据与临床专业知识相结合。本文介绍了一个临床病例场景,并采用四步循证方法,演示了如何(1)提出循证问题;(2)在MEDLINE上搜索最佳证据;(3)批判性地评价证据;(4)将证据应用于患者。该程序用一个示例问题来演示:粘结瓷单板的漂白是否会增加边缘渗漏?为最能识别问题、干预和结果的关键字的同义词开发了MEDLINE搜索策略。使用布尔运算符“或”将同义词组合起来,以确定包含14万篇期刊文章的“敏感”(即包容性)范围。然后使用布尔运算符“和”组合这些类别,以从14万篇文章中确定最“具体”(即独家)的四篇文章。最后,为了找到最好的证据,这些文章仅限于“人类”和“随机对照试验”。这确定了一篇文章。对这一篇文章中有限数据的批判性评估表明,这些方法是有效的,具有统计意义,但由于采用的方法,可能在临床上不重要。基于证据的方法在大约15分钟内将一个人带到可用信息宇宙的边缘。结果可能既令人振奋又发人深省。它们可以表明现有信息的深度或局限性,并指出知识库中需要进一步研究的空白。然而,最重要的是,结果允许从业者与患者进行深入而真实的沟通,并做出更明智的临床选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信