Operational measures: indicators of health system performance.

American journal of health planning Pub Date : 1978-01-01
S A Hadley, J F Gillespie
{"title":"Operational measures: indicators of health system performance.","authors":"S A Hadley,&nbsp;J F Gillespie","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As P.L. 93-641, the National Health Planning and Resources Development Act of 1974 makes clear, Health Systems Agencies (HSAs) were created to improve the costs, availability, accessibility, acceptability, quality, and continuity of the health system. To fulfill this mandate, agencies require clear definitions of these six characteristics and valid measures which can be applied to assess the performance of the existing health system and the impact of proposed modifications. The current state of the planning art does not provide for either of these requirements. This is due to the lack of consensus regarding the definitions of the characteristics and our limited understanding of the variety and validity of measures presently in use. Recognizing these problems, DHEW'S Bureau of Health Planning and Resources Development (BHPRD) initiated a project with The Orkand Corporation in June 1976, to accomplish the following objectives: (1) develop mutually exclusive definitions for the six characteristics; (2) identify and develop model operational measures for each of the characteristics; (3) produce guidelines for the application of these measures; and (4) design a methodology for HSAs to use in appraising the various interrelationships among characteristics. This paper is an introduction to the operational measures project. It describes the operational measures concept and the measures' intended uses. The monograph to be produced by the project is described. Finally, the project findings to date are summarized.</p>","PeriodicalId":76886,"journal":{"name":"American journal of health planning","volume":"3 1","pages":"43-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of health planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As P.L. 93-641, the National Health Planning and Resources Development Act of 1974 makes clear, Health Systems Agencies (HSAs) were created to improve the costs, availability, accessibility, acceptability, quality, and continuity of the health system. To fulfill this mandate, agencies require clear definitions of these six characteristics and valid measures which can be applied to assess the performance of the existing health system and the impact of proposed modifications. The current state of the planning art does not provide for either of these requirements. This is due to the lack of consensus regarding the definitions of the characteristics and our limited understanding of the variety and validity of measures presently in use. Recognizing these problems, DHEW'S Bureau of Health Planning and Resources Development (BHPRD) initiated a project with The Orkand Corporation in June 1976, to accomplish the following objectives: (1) develop mutually exclusive definitions for the six characteristics; (2) identify and develop model operational measures for each of the characteristics; (3) produce guidelines for the application of these measures; and (4) design a methodology for HSAs to use in appraising the various interrelationships among characteristics. This paper is an introduction to the operational measures project. It describes the operational measures concept and the measures' intended uses. The monograph to be produced by the project is described. Finally, the project findings to date are summarized.

业务措施:卫生系统绩效指标。
正如P.L. 93-641, 1974年的国家卫生计划和资源发展法案明确指出的那样,卫生系统机构(HSAs)的创建是为了提高卫生系统的成本、可用性、可及性、可接受性、质量和连续性。为履行这一任务,各机构需要明确定义这六个特征,并采取有效措施,以评估现有卫生系统的绩效和拟议修改的影响。规划技术的当前状态没有提供这些要求中的任何一个。这是由于对特征的定义缺乏共识,以及我们对目前使用的测量方法的多样性和有效性的理解有限。认识到这些问题,卫生和福利部卫生规划和资源开发局(BHPRD)于1976年6月与奥兰公司启动了一个项目,以实现以下目标:(1)为六个特征制定相互排斥的定义;(2)确定和制定每个特征的示范操作措施;(三)制定实施本办法的指引;(4)设计一种HSAs用于评价特征之间各种相互关系的方法。本文是对操作措施项目的介绍。它描述了操作度量概念和度量的预期用途。介绍了该项目即将出版的专著。最后,总结了迄今为止的项目发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书