Legal consequences of nonunion dispute-resolution systems.

Employee relations law journal Pub Date : 1987-01-01
A G Feliu
{"title":"Legal consequences of nonunion dispute-resolution systems.","authors":"A G Feliu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>No longer is alternative dispute resolution merely a trendy topic of the conference circuit. For many employers, ADR is now a key aspect of human resources management. A growing number of employers have implemented their own incarnation of alternative dispute resolution; others are actively considering the option; and still others are interested but hesitant for any of a number of reasons. This article explores the legal benefits and drawbacks to implementing internal dispute-resolution systems in the nonunion setting. Special attention is given to the key issue of preclusion--that is, the weight or effect to be given the decision of the internal system in later judicial or administrative proceedings. The article concludes by addressing the question: What is the cost to an employer of chasing the golden goose of preclusion?</p>","PeriodicalId":79590,"journal":{"name":"Employee relations law journal","volume":"13 1","pages":"83-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employee relations law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

No longer is alternative dispute resolution merely a trendy topic of the conference circuit. For many employers, ADR is now a key aspect of human resources management. A growing number of employers have implemented their own incarnation of alternative dispute resolution; others are actively considering the option; and still others are interested but hesitant for any of a number of reasons. This article explores the legal benefits and drawbacks to implementing internal dispute-resolution systems in the nonunion setting. Special attention is given to the key issue of preclusion--that is, the weight or effect to be given the decision of the internal system in later judicial or administrative proceedings. The article concludes by addressing the question: What is the cost to an employer of chasing the golden goose of preclusion?

非工会纠纷解决制度的法律后果。
替代性争端解决不再仅仅是巡回会议的时髦话题。对于许多雇主来说,ADR现在是人力资源管理的一个关键方面。越来越多的雇主实施了他们自己的替代性争议解决方案;其他人正在积极考虑这个选择;还有一些人感兴趣,但出于各种原因犹豫不决。本文探讨了在非工会环境中实施内部争议解决系统的法律利益和缺点。特别注意到排除的关键问题,即在以后的司法或行政诉讼中给予内部制度决定的份量或效力。文章最后提出了这样一个问题:雇主追逐排除这只金鹅的成本是什么?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信