D W Young, J Parkes, W A Davis, D Harman, R S Williams
{"title":"Out-patient letters: requirement and contents.","authors":"D W Young, J Parkes, W A Davis, D Harman, R S Williams","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Twenty-five general practitioners were interviewed about the contents of out-patient letters. There was universal agreement on the need for the following information: diagnosis, abnormal physical findings, abnormal routine and non-routine test results, changes in treatment, comments on the patient's physical condition and disposal. The contents of 215 out-patient letters were analysed and the results compared with the GPs' views. There was little difference in the letters from medical and surgical clinics. Both were deficient to a limited extent in the reporting of abnormal test results, the reasons for, and significance of investigations, and in detailing the information given to patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":79874,"journal":{"name":"Effective health care","volume":"2 6","pages":"225-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Effective health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Twenty-five general practitioners were interviewed about the contents of out-patient letters. There was universal agreement on the need for the following information: diagnosis, abnormal physical findings, abnormal routine and non-routine test results, changes in treatment, comments on the patient's physical condition and disposal. The contents of 215 out-patient letters were analysed and the results compared with the GPs' views. There was little difference in the letters from medical and surgical clinics. Both were deficient to a limited extent in the reporting of abnormal test results, the reasons for, and significance of investigations, and in detailing the information given to patients.