{"title":"An 'enlightened' view of employee committees under the Taft-Hartley Act.","authors":"M J Klaper","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled, in NLRB v. Streamway Division of the Scott and Fetzer Co., that an in-plant representation committee, unilaterally established by the employer, was not a labor organization. Until 1959, when the Supreme Court decided NLRB v. Cabot Carbon. \"labor organization\" was narrowly construed, based on the traditional adversary model of labor relations. With Cabot Carbon, and some later Board decisions, the definition has broadened. Now, at a time when many employers are turning to employee committees, quality circles, etc., as ways of improving relations with employees, the Streamway decision takes on particular significance. In the following article, the author examines the statutory basis for determining whether an employee committee is a labor organization, within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. He also discusses the judicial and Board precedent for the more liberal definition of \"labor organization\" set forth in Streamway.</p>","PeriodicalId":79590,"journal":{"name":"Employee relations law journal","volume":"9 3","pages":"474-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employee relations law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled, in NLRB v. Streamway Division of the Scott and Fetzer Co., that an in-plant representation committee, unilaterally established by the employer, was not a labor organization. Until 1959, when the Supreme Court decided NLRB v. Cabot Carbon. "labor organization" was narrowly construed, based on the traditional adversary model of labor relations. With Cabot Carbon, and some later Board decisions, the definition has broadened. Now, at a time when many employers are turning to employee committees, quality circles, etc., as ways of improving relations with employees, the Streamway decision takes on particular significance. In the following article, the author examines the statutory basis for determining whether an employee committee is a labor organization, within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. He also discusses the judicial and Board precedent for the more liberal definition of "labor organization" set forth in Streamway.
最近,第六巡回上诉法院在NLRB诉Scott and Fetzer公司的Streamway分部一案中裁定,由雇主单方面成立的厂内代表委员会不属于劳工组织。直到1959年,最高法院判决了NLRB诉卡伯特·卡本案。“劳工组织”被狭义地解释为基于传统的劳资关系对抗模式。随着卡博特碳素公司和董事会后来的一些决定,这一定义得到了扩大。现在,当许多雇主转向员工委员会,质量圈等,作为改善与员工关系的方式时,Streamway的决定具有特别的意义。在下一篇文章中,作者探讨了在《国家劳动关系法》的意义上确定雇员委员会是否为劳工组织的法律依据。他还讨论了在Streamway中提出的对“劳工组织”更为自由的定义的司法和董事会先例。