Physicians' sources of information about teratogenic effects of drugs.

R C Hatton, P L Doering, J L Frias
{"title":"Physicians' sources of information about teratogenic effects of drugs.","authors":"R C Hatton, P L Doering, J L Frias","doi":"10.1177/009286158201600309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Physicians are frequently called upon to prescribe or give advice about drugs used during pregnancy. Many of these drugs are used effectively and without complications while others may adversely affect prenatal development. Information about risks, however, is scanty, not critically reviewed, and dispersed in the literature, seldom providing clinically useful information. The inadequacy of literature sources results partiaUy because of moral and legal considerations regarding research with pregnant women. Study of drug effects by conventional, prospective, double-blind techniques cannot be performed; therefore, alternative and less satisfactory study methods are employed. Animal studies cannot always be extrapolated to humans. Large scale retrospective studies often have numerous shortcomings including exposure to multiple drugs, the occurrence of confounding diseases, and incomplete or inacurate exposure data. Anecdotal case reports lack the controls necessary to establish causality and may, therefore, represent coincidental drug exposure in a child with a malformation produced by other causes. Thus, by dcfault, manufacturers must use the disclaiming statement, “Safety of the use of this drug during pregnancy has not","PeriodicalId":51023,"journal":{"name":"Drug Information Journal","volume":"16 3","pages":"148-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/009286158201600309","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Information Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/009286158201600309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Physicians are frequently called upon to prescribe or give advice about drugs used during pregnancy. Many of these drugs are used effectively and without complications while others may adversely affect prenatal development. Information about risks, however, is scanty, not critically reviewed, and dispersed in the literature, seldom providing clinically useful information. The inadequacy of literature sources results partiaUy because of moral and legal considerations regarding research with pregnant women. Study of drug effects by conventional, prospective, double-blind techniques cannot be performed; therefore, alternative and less satisfactory study methods are employed. Animal studies cannot always be extrapolated to humans. Large scale retrospective studies often have numerous shortcomings including exposure to multiple drugs, the occurrence of confounding diseases, and incomplete or inacurate exposure data. Anecdotal case reports lack the controls necessary to establish causality and may, therefore, represent coincidental drug exposure in a child with a malformation produced by other causes. Thus, by dcfault, manufacturers must use the disclaiming statement, “Safety of the use of this drug during pregnancy has not
医生关于药物致畸作用的信息来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug Information Journal
Drug Information Journal 医学-卫生保健
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信