Evaluation of a self-teaching program

Ph.D. Carl R. Roberts, Ed.D. Michael C. Hosokawa, M.S.P.H. Beth Walts, M.S.P.H. Ruth Mueller
{"title":"Evaluation of a self-teaching program","authors":"Ph.D. Carl R. Roberts,&nbsp;Ed.D. Michael C. Hosokawa,&nbsp;M.S.P.H. Beth Walts,&nbsp;M.S.P.H. Ruth Mueller","doi":"10.1016/S0738-3991(82)80008-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A self-teaching booklet on hypertension was evaluated in two populations: clients attending public health screening clinics and inpatients at a Veterans Administration hospital. Participants were randomized into an education or a control group. Evaluation consisted of measuring knowledge gained from the booklet immediately after reading it and retention of key concepts two weeks later. Men did better than women, and VA education participants did better than VA controls. No differences were detected between the public health education and control groups or the combined (VA and public health) education and control groups. The selfteaching booklet alone did not appear to yield a measurable amount of new knowledge. Health professionals, when educating patients and evaluating programs, should consider combinations of educational methods when using self-teaching programs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":80115,"journal":{"name":"Patient counselling and health education","volume":"3 4","pages":"Pages 161-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0738-3991(82)80008-6","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient counselling and health education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738399182800086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

A self-teaching booklet on hypertension was evaluated in two populations: clients attending public health screening clinics and inpatients at a Veterans Administration hospital. Participants were randomized into an education or a control group. Evaluation consisted of measuring knowledge gained from the booklet immediately after reading it and retention of key concepts two weeks later. Men did better than women, and VA education participants did better than VA controls. No differences were detected between the public health education and control groups or the combined (VA and public health) education and control groups. The selfteaching booklet alone did not appear to yield a measurable amount of new knowledge. Health professionals, when educating patients and evaluating programs, should consider combinations of educational methods when using self-teaching programs.

对自学计划的评估
在两个人群中评估了一本关于高血压的自学手册:在公共健康检查诊所就诊的客户和在退伍军人管理局医院住院的患者。参与者被随机分为教育组和对照组。评估包括在阅读后立即测量从小册子中获得的知识,并在两周后保留关键概念。男性比女性表现更好,退伍军人事务部教育参与者比退伍军人事务部控制组表现更好。公共卫生教育组和对照组之间,或联合(VA和公共卫生)教育组和对照组之间,没有发现差异。单独的自学手册似乎并没有产生可测量的新知识。卫生专业人员在教育患者和评估项目时,应考虑使用自学项目时的教育方法组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信