Alcohol initiation outcomes of universal family-focused preventive interventions: one- and two-year follow-ups of a controlled study.

R Spoth, C Redmond, H Lepper
{"title":"Alcohol initiation outcomes of universal family-focused preventive interventions: one- and two-year follow-ups of a controlled study.","authors":"R Spoth,&nbsp;C Redmond,&nbsp;H Lepper","doi":"10.15288/jsas.1999.s13.103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This article summarizes the literature on alcohol initiation outcomes of universal family interventions and examines the long-term effects of the Iowa Strengthening Families Program (ISFP) on these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A longitudinal, controlled efficacy study of the ISFP was conducted with 446 families from 22 rural school districts in a Midwestern state. Alcohol initiation behaviors were measured by a four-item index (Alcohol Initiation Index [AII]), with low scores representing a lower level of alcohol initiation. The AII was examined using mixed-model analyses of covariance. Relative reduction rates for individual initiation behaviors and initiation differences among higher- and lower-dosage intervention groups were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AII scores were significantly lower among intervention group adolescents than among control group adolescents at 1- and 2-year follow-up assessments. Relative-reduction rate differences between intervention and control groups on specific alcohol initiation behaviors (e.g., onset of drinking without parental permission, onset of drunkenness) ranged from approximately 30% to 60%. Dosage-related initiation differences were evident only at the 1-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Studies indicating the public health benefits of universal interventions that delay the initiation of alcohol use also underscore the importance of the current line of investigation. All effect sizes and relative reduction rates of specific alcohol initiation behaviors suggest the practical significance of the findings. The gap in the prevention outcome knowledge base in this area of investigation could be filled with more rigorous universal family-focused intervention studies that address a wide range of implementation and methodological issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":17056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of studies on alcohol. Supplement","volume":"13 ","pages":"103-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15288/jsas.1999.s13.103","citationCount":"150","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of studies on alcohol. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsas.1999.s13.103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 150

Abstract

Objective: This article summarizes the literature on alcohol initiation outcomes of universal family interventions and examines the long-term effects of the Iowa Strengthening Families Program (ISFP) on these outcomes.

Method: A longitudinal, controlled efficacy study of the ISFP was conducted with 446 families from 22 rural school districts in a Midwestern state. Alcohol initiation behaviors were measured by a four-item index (Alcohol Initiation Index [AII]), with low scores representing a lower level of alcohol initiation. The AII was examined using mixed-model analyses of covariance. Relative reduction rates for individual initiation behaviors and initiation differences among higher- and lower-dosage intervention groups were calculated.

Results: AII scores were significantly lower among intervention group adolescents than among control group adolescents at 1- and 2-year follow-up assessments. Relative-reduction rate differences between intervention and control groups on specific alcohol initiation behaviors (e.g., onset of drinking without parental permission, onset of drunkenness) ranged from approximately 30% to 60%. Dosage-related initiation differences were evident only at the 1-year follow-up.

Conclusions: Studies indicating the public health benefits of universal interventions that delay the initiation of alcohol use also underscore the importance of the current line of investigation. All effect sizes and relative reduction rates of specific alcohol initiation behaviors suggest the practical significance of the findings. The gap in the prevention outcome knowledge base in this area of investigation could be filled with more rigorous universal family-focused intervention studies that address a wide range of implementation and methodological issues.

以家庭为中心的普遍预防干预措施的酒精起始结果:一项对照研究的1年和2年随访
目的:本文总结了关于普遍家庭干预的酒精起始结果的文献,并检查了爱荷华州加强家庭计划(ISFP)对这些结果的长期影响。方法:对美国中西部一个州22个农村学区的446个家庭进行了ISFP的纵向对照疗效研究。酒精启动行为通过四项指数(酒精启动指数[AII])进行测量,得分越低,酒精启动水平越低。采用协方差混合模型分析检验AII。计算了高剂量和低剂量干预组之间个体起始行为的相对减少率和起始差异。结果:在1年和2年的随访评估中,干预组青少年的AII得分明显低于对照组青少年。干预组和对照组在特定酒精起始行为(例如,未经父母允许开始饮酒,开始醉酒)上的相对减少率差异约为30%至60%。剂量相关的起始差异仅在1年随访时才明显。结论:研究表明,推迟开始饮酒的普遍干预措施对公共卫生有益,也强调了当前调查的重要性。所有的效应大小和特定酒精起始行为的相对减少率表明了研究结果的实际意义。在这一调查领域,预防结果知识库的空白可以通过更严格的以家庭为中心的普遍干预研究来填补,这些研究解决了广泛的实施和方法问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信