Patient satisfaction with telemedicine consultation in primary care: comparison of ratings of medical and mental health applications.

E J Callahan, D M Hilty, T S Nesbitt
{"title":"Patient satisfaction with telemedicine consultation in primary care: comparison of ratings of medical and mental health applications.","authors":"E J Callahan,&nbsp;D M Hilty,&nbsp;T S Nesbitt","doi":"10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the viability of telemedicine as a vehicle for offering mental health consultations to primary-care patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Satisfaction ratings from 34 mental health encounters were compared with ratings from a convenience sample of 59 non-mental health encounters on four aspects of satisfaction: self-reported ability to speak freely; probability of further use of telemedicine; perceived experience of telemedicine personnel; and relative preference for a telemedicine visit compared with a face-to-face visit. The study was conducted in the context of the Telemedicine Program at the University of California, Davis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in satisfaction were found between mental health and non-mental health encounter groups for any of the four aspects of satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ratings from patients receiving mental health consultation using telemedicine yielded levels of satisfaction similar to those found in telemedicine consultations in non-mental health medical areas. The results support telemedicine as a means to extend mental health consultation to rural primary-care patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":79734,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":"4 4","pages":"363-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.363","citationCount":"80","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 80

Abstract

Objective: To assess the viability of telemedicine as a vehicle for offering mental health consultations to primary-care patients.

Methods: Satisfaction ratings from 34 mental health encounters were compared with ratings from a convenience sample of 59 non-mental health encounters on four aspects of satisfaction: self-reported ability to speak freely; probability of further use of telemedicine; perceived experience of telemedicine personnel; and relative preference for a telemedicine visit compared with a face-to-face visit. The study was conducted in the context of the Telemedicine Program at the University of California, Davis.

Results: No significant differences in satisfaction were found between mental health and non-mental health encounter groups for any of the four aspects of satisfaction.

Conclusions: Ratings from patients receiving mental health consultation using telemedicine yielded levels of satisfaction similar to those found in telemedicine consultations in non-mental health medical areas. The results support telemedicine as a means to extend mental health consultation to rural primary-care patients.

患者对初级保健远程医疗咨询的满意度:医疗和心理健康应用评分的比较。
目的:评估远程医疗作为一种向初级保健患者提供心理健康咨询的手段的可行性。方法:将34次心理健康就诊的满意度评分与59次便利样本的非心理健康就诊的满意度评分在四个方面进行比较:自我报告的自由发言能力;进一步使用远程医疗的可能性;远程医疗人员感知经验;以及与面对面就诊相比,人们对远程医疗就诊的相对偏好。这项研究是在加州大学戴维斯分校远程医疗项目的背景下进行的。结果:心理健康组和非心理健康组在四个方面的满意度均无显著差异。结论:使用远程医疗接受心理健康咨询的患者的满意度与非心理健康医疗领域的远程医疗咨询的满意度相似。研究结果支持将远程医疗作为向农村初级保健患者提供心理健康咨询的一种手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信