Future directions for research in laboratory medicine: the findings of a Delphi survey of stakeholders.

H Maibach, R Keenlyside, D Fitzmaurice, D Brogan, J Essien
{"title":"Future directions for research in laboratory medicine: the findings of a Delphi survey of stakeholders.","authors":"H Maibach,&nbsp;R Keenlyside,&nbsp;D Fitzmaurice,&nbsp;D Brogan,&nbsp;J Essien","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In July 1995, we asked 101 experts to anticipate future areas for research in clinical laboratory medicine using a modified Delphi survey approach. The panel included academicians, clinical laboratory professionals, laboratory managers, practicing physicians public health officials, hospital administrators, and representatives of manufacturing industries, managed care organizations, commercial laboratories, and government health agencies. The participants predicted fewer laboratories, more automation, and fewer skilled staff needed in the future. The consensus was that laboratory quality assurance will focus on patient outcomes and be benchmarked against peer groups. They agreed that quality assurance routinely will be integrated into testing kits. Measures derived from medical informatics, such as outcomes analysis and utilization statistics, will become a standard feature of health care. A major area of concern was the effect that reorganizing health care and striving for cost containment will have on laboratory services. These views were consistent with those expressed by participants at a CDC conference on the frontiers of laboratory medicine research held shortly after the study was completed. These topics by now are familiar to most laboratory professionals, and we urge them to explore the many research issues raised with their colleagues in their clinical laboratories, health-care organizations, and industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":79576,"journal":{"name":"Clinical laboratory management review : official publication of the Clinical Laboratory Management Association","volume":"12 4","pages":"221-30; discussion 231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical laboratory management review : official publication of the Clinical Laboratory Management Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In July 1995, we asked 101 experts to anticipate future areas for research in clinical laboratory medicine using a modified Delphi survey approach. The panel included academicians, clinical laboratory professionals, laboratory managers, practicing physicians public health officials, hospital administrators, and representatives of manufacturing industries, managed care organizations, commercial laboratories, and government health agencies. The participants predicted fewer laboratories, more automation, and fewer skilled staff needed in the future. The consensus was that laboratory quality assurance will focus on patient outcomes and be benchmarked against peer groups. They agreed that quality assurance routinely will be integrated into testing kits. Measures derived from medical informatics, such as outcomes analysis and utilization statistics, will become a standard feature of health care. A major area of concern was the effect that reorganizing health care and striving for cost containment will have on laboratory services. These views were consistent with those expressed by participants at a CDC conference on the frontiers of laboratory medicine research held shortly after the study was completed. These topics by now are familiar to most laboratory professionals, and we urge them to explore the many research issues raised with their colleagues in their clinical laboratories, health-care organizations, and industry.

检验医学研究的未来方向:利益相关者德尔菲调查的结果。
1995年7月,我们要求101位专家使用改进的德尔菲调查方法预测临床检验医学未来的研究领域。专家组成员包括院士、临床实验室专业人员、实验室管理人员、执业医生、公共卫生官员、医院管理人员以及制造业、管理式医疗组织、商业实验室和政府卫生机构的代表。参与者预测,未来实验室会减少,自动化程度会提高,需要的熟练员工也会减少。达成的共识是,实验室质量保证将以病人的结果为重点,并以同行群体为基准。他们同意将质量保证常规纳入检测试剂盒。从医学信息学中得出的措施,如结果分析和利用统计,将成为卫生保健的标准特征。一个主要的关切领域是改组卫生保健和努力控制成本将对实验室服务产生的影响。这些观点与在研究完成后不久举行的疾病控制与预防中心实验室医学研究前沿会议上与会者所表达的观点一致。到目前为止,这些主题对大多数实验室专业人员来说都是熟悉的,我们敦促他们与临床实验室、卫生保健组织和行业的同事一起探索提出的许多研究问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信