Variation in mortality among seven hemodialysis centers as a quality indicator.

B Mozes, E Shabtai, D Zucker
{"title":"Variation in mortality among seven hemodialysis centers as a quality indicator.","authors":"B Mozes,&nbsp;E Shabtai,&nbsp;D Zucker","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify patient attributes that were associated with increased mortality; variables that were associated with process of care that were correlated with mortality; and outlier centers after adjustment for patient attributes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Standard interviews were conducted by trained nurses with all patients. Detailed information regarding primary renal diagnosis, comorbidity, and results of laboratory tests were obtained from the medical charts. The vital status of the patients was obtained from the records of each of the centers. We used the Cox hazard method to identify variables that correlated with a 1-year mortality. Centers with observed mortality exceeding the 95% confidence interval (CI95) of the expected probability of death were marked as outliers.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Seven dialysis centers located in large teaching hospitals in Israel.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>The current study included patients > 16 years of age who had undergone hemodialysis > 4 weeks prior to the day of data collection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 564 patients. Significant differences were found in patient demographics and process variables among the centers. The following variables correlated with mortality; diabetes (odds ratio [OR], 2.03; CI95, 1.28-3.21); ischemic heart disease (OR, 2.2; CI95, 1.39-3.49); each year of age (OR, 1.04; CI95, 1.02-1.06); each 1 g% of albumin (OR, 0.51; CI95, 0.30-0.86). The average observed mortality in all centers was 17.4%. After adjustment for casemix, one center showed excess mortality (24% observed compared to 15% expected after adjustment for patient attributes; CI95, 6.2-23.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ability to compare mortality rates among dialysis centers to detect possible quality outliers depends on thorough consideration of patient attributes and random variation.</p>","PeriodicalId":79831,"journal":{"name":"Clinical performance and quality health care","volume":"6 2","pages":"73-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical performance and quality health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To identify patient attributes that were associated with increased mortality; variables that were associated with process of care that were correlated with mortality; and outlier centers after adjustment for patient attributes.

Design: Standard interviews were conducted by trained nurses with all patients. Detailed information regarding primary renal diagnosis, comorbidity, and results of laboratory tests were obtained from the medical charts. The vital status of the patients was obtained from the records of each of the centers. We used the Cox hazard method to identify variables that correlated with a 1-year mortality. Centers with observed mortality exceeding the 95% confidence interval (CI95) of the expected probability of death were marked as outliers.

Setting: Seven dialysis centers located in large teaching hospitals in Israel.

Patients: The current study included patients > 16 years of age who had undergone hemodialysis > 4 weeks prior to the day of data collection.

Results: The study included 564 patients. Significant differences were found in patient demographics and process variables among the centers. The following variables correlated with mortality; diabetes (odds ratio [OR], 2.03; CI95, 1.28-3.21); ischemic heart disease (OR, 2.2; CI95, 1.39-3.49); each year of age (OR, 1.04; CI95, 1.02-1.06); each 1 g% of albumin (OR, 0.51; CI95, 0.30-0.86). The average observed mortality in all centers was 17.4%. After adjustment for casemix, one center showed excess mortality (24% observed compared to 15% expected after adjustment for patient attributes; CI95, 6.2-23.7).

Conclusions: The ability to compare mortality rates among dialysis centers to detect possible quality outliers depends on thorough consideration of patient attributes and random variation.

7个血液透析中心的死亡率差异作为质量指标。
目的:确定与死亡率增加相关的患者属性;与护理过程相关的变量与死亡率相关;调整患者属性后的离群中心。设计:由训练有素的护士对所有患者进行标准访谈。从医学图表中获得了有关原发性肾脏诊断、合并症和实验室检查结果的详细信息。从每个中心的记录中获得患者的生命状况。我们使用Cox风险法来确定与1年死亡率相关的变量。观察到的死亡率超过预期死亡概率的95%置信区间(CI95)的中心被标记为异常值。环境:位于以色列大型教学医院的七个透析中心。患者:目前的研究包括> 16岁且在数据收集日前> 4周接受血液透析的患者。结果:纳入564例患者。各中心在患者人口统计学和过程变量方面存在显著差异。以下变量与死亡率相关:糖尿病(优势比[OR], 2.03;CI95, 1.28 - -3.21);缺血性心脏病(OR, 2.2;CI95, 1.39 - -3.49);每年年龄(OR, 1.04;CI95, 1.02 - -1.06);每1 g%的白蛋白(OR, 0.51;CI95, 0.30 - -0.86)。所有中心的平均观察死亡率为17.4%。在调整病例组合后,一个中心显示超额死亡率(观察到24%,而调整患者属性后预期为15%;CI95, 6.2 - -23.7)。结论:比较透析中心之间的死亡率以发现可能的质量异常值的能力取决于对患者属性和随机变异的全面考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信