Measuring pediatric immunization status in a managed care organization: agreement between medical charts and parent telephone interviews.

HMO practice Pub Date : 1997-09-01
C A McPhillips-Tangum, R Aubert, C M Bailey, J P Koplan
{"title":"Measuring pediatric immunization status in a managed care organization: agreement between medical charts and parent telephone interviews.","authors":"C A McPhillips-Tangum,&nbsp;R Aubert,&nbsp;C M Bailey,&nbsp;J P Koplan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To measure the agreement between pediatric immunization data obtained from medical charts and data provided by parents during telephone interviews and to assess the reliability of immunization information provided during parent telephone interviews.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Medical charts reviews and telephone interviews with parents.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Prudential HealthCare.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Children sampled for the 1993 HEDIS study and the parents of those children (n = 356).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Overall agreement between immunization data obtained from medical charts and data provided by parents during telephone interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Agreement between immunization data obtained from medical charts and data provided in parent telephone interviews varies from poor to good if the parent refers to a shot record during the interview. Agreement between the two data sources is better with single dose vaccines (i.e., 1 MMR) than multiple dose vaccines (i.e., 4 DTP). Although parents tend to report fewer immunizations than are indicated in the child's medical chart, the medical charts in this study contained too many vaccine omissions to be considered reliable \"gold standards\" of vaccine receipt. Parents who refer to a shot record when providing information about pediatric immunizations provide reliable data (r = .8807-1.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When measuring completion of the immunization series, especially among parents who do not have access to a shot record, medical chart reviews remain the better approach in the managed care setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":79628,"journal":{"name":"HMO practice","volume":"11 3","pages":"104-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HMO practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To measure the agreement between pediatric immunization data obtained from medical charts and data provided by parents during telephone interviews and to assess the reliability of immunization information provided during parent telephone interviews.

Design: Medical charts reviews and telephone interviews with parents.

Setting: Prudential HealthCare.

Participants: Children sampled for the 1993 HEDIS study and the parents of those children (n = 356).

Main outcome measure: Overall agreement between immunization data obtained from medical charts and data provided by parents during telephone interviews.

Results: Agreement between immunization data obtained from medical charts and data provided in parent telephone interviews varies from poor to good if the parent refers to a shot record during the interview. Agreement between the two data sources is better with single dose vaccines (i.e., 1 MMR) than multiple dose vaccines (i.e., 4 DTP). Although parents tend to report fewer immunizations than are indicated in the child's medical chart, the medical charts in this study contained too many vaccine omissions to be considered reliable "gold standards" of vaccine receipt. Parents who refer to a shot record when providing information about pediatric immunizations provide reliable data (r = .8807-1.0).

Conclusion: When measuring completion of the immunization series, especially among parents who do not have access to a shot record, medical chart reviews remain the better approach in the managed care setting.

在管理式医疗机构中测量儿科免疫状况:医疗图表和家长电话访谈之间的一致性。
目的:衡量医学图表获取的儿童免疫接种资料与家长电话访问资料的一致性,评估家长电话访问提供的儿童免疫接种信息的可靠性。设计:病历回顾和与家长的电话访谈。公司背景:保诚医疗。参与者:1993年HEDIS研究的抽样儿童和这些儿童的父母(n = 356)。主要结果测量:从医疗图表中获得的免疫数据与家长在电话访谈中提供的数据之间总体一致。结果:当家长在访问时参考疫苗接种记录时,医学图表获得的免疫接种数据与家长电话访问提供的数据的一致性有差有好。单剂疫苗(即1剂MMR混合疫苗)比多剂疫苗(即4剂百白破疫苗)在这两个数据来源之间的一致性更好。尽管父母报告的免疫接种次数往往少于儿童医疗图表中显示的数量,但本研究中的医疗图表中包含了太多的疫苗遗漏,不能被认为是疫苗接收的可靠“金标准”。家长在提供儿童免疫接种信息时参考疫苗接种记录提供了可靠的数据(r = .8807-1.0)。结论:当测量免疫系列的完成情况时,特别是在没有获得注射记录的父母中,医疗图表审查仍然是管理式医疗环境中更好的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书