Comparing today's revascularization strategies for CAD. Benefits and drawbacks of thrombolytics, PTCA, CABG.

The Journal of critical illness Pub Date : 1995-08-01
S F Aranki, L H Cohn
{"title":"Comparing today's revascularization strategies for CAD. Benefits and drawbacks of thrombolytics, PTCA, CABG.","authors":"S F Aranki,&nbsp;L H Cohn","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A number of factors must be considered when selecting a revascularization strategy for a patient with CAD: Is the patient's condition stable or unstable? How many vessels are affected? What are the benefits and drawbacks of each technique? For patients with an evolving infarction, either thrombolysis or PTCA can achieve early reperfusion. PTCA is also often helpful for those with one- or two-vessel disease; however, restenosis develops in 30% to 50% of patients, usually within 6 months. Although CABG can produce excellent long-term results for patients with three-vessel or left main artery disease and for those with proximal stenosis, the risk of perioperative complications and bypass graft disease remains significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":80210,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of critical illness","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of critical illness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A number of factors must be considered when selecting a revascularization strategy for a patient with CAD: Is the patient's condition stable or unstable? How many vessels are affected? What are the benefits and drawbacks of each technique? For patients with an evolving infarction, either thrombolysis or PTCA can achieve early reperfusion. PTCA is also often helpful for those with one- or two-vessel disease; however, restenosis develops in 30% to 50% of patients, usually within 6 months. Although CABG can produce excellent long-term results for patients with three-vessel or left main artery disease and for those with proximal stenosis, the risk of perioperative complications and bypass graft disease remains significant.

比较当今CAD的血运重建策略。溶栓、PTCA、CABG的利弊。
在为冠心病患者选择血运重建策略时,必须考虑许多因素:患者的病情是稳定的还是不稳定的?有多少血管受到影响?每种技术的优点和缺点是什么?对于进展中的梗死患者,溶栓或PTCA均可实现早期再灌注。PTCA对单支或双支血管疾病患者也有帮助;然而,30%至50%的患者发生再狭窄,通常在6个月内发生。尽管CABG对于三支血管或左主干疾病以及近端狭窄的患者可以产生良好的长期效果,但围手术期并发症和旁路移植疾病的风险仍然很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信