Accidental needlesticks: do anesthesiologists practice proper infection control precautions?

A D Rosenberg, D B Bernstein, R L Bernstein, M L Skovron, S Ramanathan, H Turndorf
{"title":"Accidental needlesticks: do anesthesiologists practice proper infection control precautions?","authors":"A D Rosenberg,&nbsp;D B Bernstein,&nbsp;R L Bernstein,&nbsp;M L Skovron,&nbsp;S Ramanathan,&nbsp;H Turndorf","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anesthesiologists as well as patients are at risk for acquiring blood-borne infections such as hepatitis and AIDS. We surveyed 2,530 anesthesiologists, a 10% random sample of the members of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, with a response rate of 57.1%, to determine the incidence of accidental needlestick exposure among anesthesia personnel and whether anesthesiologists are adhering to infection control guidelines to protect themselves and their patients from exposure to infectious diseases. Eighty-eight percent of respondents reported at least 1 accidental needlestick in the past 10 years; 21% received a needlestick from a high-risk patient and 4.5% a needlestick from a known HIV-positive patients. Residents reported significantly more accidental needlesticks from known HIV-positive patients (8.5%). Mucous membrane, open cut, eye, or other significant exposure to HIV-contaminated blood or body fluids was sustained by 8.34% of respondents in the past 10 years. Sixty percent of respondents reported they almost never reuse common syringes now compared with a 40.8% non-reuse rate (P < 0.001) in a similar survey on infection control practices conducted in 1990. Sixty-three percent reported they almost never reuse a vasopressor syringe compared with the 1990 non-reuse rate of 52.5% (P < 0.001). In the current survey, 39% of anesthesiologists reported reusing syringes from one patient to another and 36% reported reusing the same vasopressor syringes for different patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":80191,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of anesthesiology","volume":"22 3","pages":"125-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anesthesiologists as well as patients are at risk for acquiring blood-borne infections such as hepatitis and AIDS. We surveyed 2,530 anesthesiologists, a 10% random sample of the members of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, with a response rate of 57.1%, to determine the incidence of accidental needlestick exposure among anesthesia personnel and whether anesthesiologists are adhering to infection control guidelines to protect themselves and their patients from exposure to infectious diseases. Eighty-eight percent of respondents reported at least 1 accidental needlestick in the past 10 years; 21% received a needlestick from a high-risk patient and 4.5% a needlestick from a known HIV-positive patients. Residents reported significantly more accidental needlesticks from known HIV-positive patients (8.5%). Mucous membrane, open cut, eye, or other significant exposure to HIV-contaminated blood or body fluids was sustained by 8.34% of respondents in the past 10 years. Sixty percent of respondents reported they almost never reuse common syringes now compared with a 40.8% non-reuse rate (P < 0.001) in a similar survey on infection control practices conducted in 1990. Sixty-three percent reported they almost never reuse a vasopressor syringe compared with the 1990 non-reuse rate of 52.5% (P < 0.001). In the current survey, 39% of anesthesiologists reported reusing syringes from one patient to another and 36% reported reusing the same vasopressor syringes for different patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

意外针刺:麻醉医师是否采取适当的感染控制措施?
麻醉师和病人都有感染血源性感染的风险,如肝炎和艾滋病。我们调查了2530名麻醉医师,随机抽取美国麻醉医师学会会员的10%,应答率为57.1%,以确定麻醉人员意外针头暴露的发生率,以及麻醉医师是否遵守感染控制指南,以保护自己和患者免受传染病的暴露。88%的受访者报告在过去10年中至少发生过一次意外针刺;21%的人获得了来自高危患者的针头,4.5%的人获得了来自已知艾滋病毒阳性患者的针头。居民报告的已知hiv阳性患者意外针刺发生率显著增加(8.5%)。8.34%的应答者在过去10年中持续有粘膜、开放性伤口、眼睛或其他明显暴露于hiv污染的血液或体液的情况。60%的答复者报告说,他们现在几乎从不重复使用普通注射器,而在1990年进行的关于感染控制做法的类似调查中,不重复使用的比例为40.8% (P < 0.001)。63%的人报告他们几乎从不重复使用血管加压剂注射器,而1990年的非重复使用率为52.5% (P < 0.001)。在目前的调查中,39%的麻醉医师报告在不同患者之间重复使用注射器,36%的麻醉医师报告在不同患者之间重复使用相同的血管加压剂注射器。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书