Varus tension testing of fixation devices used in proximal tibial osteotomy.

Contemporary orthopaedics Pub Date : 1995-06-01
Y Zhang, L M Shall, P G Kiritsis, L Wolfinbarger, J R Fairclots
{"title":"Varus tension testing of fixation devices used in proximal tibial osteotomy.","authors":"Y Zhang,&nbsp;L M Shall,&nbsp;P G Kiritsis,&nbsp;L Wolfinbarger,&nbsp;J R Fairclots","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Varus tension testing was performed on 26 matched pairs of tibias after high tibial osteotomy with three different fixation techniques--Coventry stepped staple, Mansat staple blade, and modified tension-band. Biomechanical testing revealed that in group I the Coventry stepped staple and Mansat staple blade yielded similar force at failure values of 132.44 +/- 29.29 and 137.34 +/- 40.84, respectively. In group II, the varus force at failure value was 170.45 +/- 83.95 for the modified tension band device versus 115.27 +/- 67.21 for the Coventry stepped staple device. In group III, the varus force at failure value was 180.26 +/- 82.36 for the modified tension band device versus 109.14 +/- 60.96 for the Mansat staple blade. The findings in this study suggest that the modified tension band technique provides a greater varus force at failure value, approximately 160-170%, compared to the other two techniques. In addition, this device is easy to apply and less expensive, and most orthopaedic surgeons are already familiar with its use.</p>","PeriodicalId":79846,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary orthopaedics","volume":"30 6","pages":"471-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Varus tension testing was performed on 26 matched pairs of tibias after high tibial osteotomy with three different fixation techniques--Coventry stepped staple, Mansat staple blade, and modified tension-band. Biomechanical testing revealed that in group I the Coventry stepped staple and Mansat staple blade yielded similar force at failure values of 132.44 +/- 29.29 and 137.34 +/- 40.84, respectively. In group II, the varus force at failure value was 170.45 +/- 83.95 for the modified tension band device versus 115.27 +/- 67.21 for the Coventry stepped staple device. In group III, the varus force at failure value was 180.26 +/- 82.36 for the modified tension band device versus 109.14 +/- 60.96 for the Mansat staple blade. The findings in this study suggest that the modified tension band technique provides a greater varus force at failure value, approximately 160-170%, compared to the other two techniques. In addition, this device is easy to apply and less expensive, and most orthopaedic surgeons are already familiar with its use.

胫骨近端截骨固定装置内翻张力试验。
采用三种不同的固定技术(Coventry踏步式钉钉、Mansat钉钉刀片和改良张力带)对高位胫骨截骨后的26对胫骨进行内翻张力测试。生物力学测试显示,在第一组中,考文垂式钉钉和Mansat钉钉刀片在破坏值分别为132.44 +/- 29.29和137.34 +/- 40.84时产生相似的力。在第二组中,改良张力带装置的失效值内翻力为170.45 +/- 83.95,而考文垂阶梯钉钉装置的失效值为115.27 +/- 67.21。在第三组中,改良张力带装置失效时的内翻力为180.26 +/- 82.36,而Mansat钉片的内翻力为109.14 +/- 60.96。本研究结果表明,与其他两种技术相比,改良张力带技术在失效值时提供了更大的内翻力,约为160-170%。此外,该设备易于使用且价格较低,大多数骨科医生已经熟悉其使用方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信