The technique of dorsalis pedis cannulation. An overlooked option when the radial artery cannot be used.

The Journal of critical illness Pub Date : 1995-07-01
C M Franklin
{"title":"The technique of dorsalis pedis cannulation. An overlooked option when the radial artery cannot be used.","authors":"C M Franklin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When arterial cannulation is required, but the radial artery cannot be used, five alternatives can be considered: the ulnar, brachial, axillary, femoral, and dorsalis pedis arteries. Of these, the dorsalis pedis may be the next best choice: Collateral flow is excellent, and cannulation here is easy to perform, presents minimal patient inconvenience, and has a very low incidence of complications. Systolic pressure readings obtained at the dorsalis pedis artery are 5 to 20 mm Hg higher than measurements obtained at the radial artery; however, by comparing the dorsalis pedis reading with a cuff pressure, you can quickly determine the extent of overshoot and correct the invasive measurement.</p>","PeriodicalId":80210,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of critical illness","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of critical illness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When arterial cannulation is required, but the radial artery cannot be used, five alternatives can be considered: the ulnar, brachial, axillary, femoral, and dorsalis pedis arteries. Of these, the dorsalis pedis may be the next best choice: Collateral flow is excellent, and cannulation here is easy to perform, presents minimal patient inconvenience, and has a very low incidence of complications. Systolic pressure readings obtained at the dorsalis pedis artery are 5 to 20 mm Hg higher than measurements obtained at the radial artery; however, by comparing the dorsalis pedis reading with a cuff pressure, you can quickly determine the extent of overshoot and correct the invasive measurement.

足背置管技术。当桡动脉不能使用时,这是一个被忽视的选择。
当需要动脉插管,但不能使用桡动脉时,可以考虑五种替代方案:尺动脉、肱动脉、腋窝动脉、股动脉和足背动脉。其中,足背可能是次佳选择:侧支血流良好,此处插管容易操作,给患者带来的不便最小,并发症发生率极低。足背动脉的收缩压读数比桡动脉高5 ~ 20mmhg;然而,通过将足背读数与袖带压力进行比较,您可以快速确定超调的程度并纠正侵入性测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信