A comparison of infusion devices at 1 ml/hr.

B R Wood, K Huddleston, P Kolm
{"title":"A comparison of infusion devices at 1 ml/hr.","authors":"B R Wood,&nbsp;K Huddleston,&nbsp;P Kolm","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Delivery of medications by some infusion devices is irregular. This study investigated instantaneous flow in several infusion devices set at a rate of 1 ml/hr. The following devices were tested: Infusion Pumps: IMED 956A, IVAC 570, IVION \"Kids Pump.\" Syringe Pumps: Medfusion, Baxter, Baxter OR. Tests were performed using a Bio-Tek Infusion Device Analyzer (Model IDA-1). Instantaneous flow rate was defined as Q1/T1 where: Q=sample volume and T=time required to deliver sample volume. The infusion devices were received directly from their respective manufacturers and had not seen clinical service before testing. The units were fully charged and were tested while on AC power. The tests were conducted by the authors, using standard infusion sets and commercially prepared 5% dextrose and 0.45% sodium chloride solution. Each pump was tested for several hours and multiple trials were performed on each pump. The infusion pumps, IMED, IVION, and IVAC all demonstrated deviations from the desired flow rate. The IVAC pump had a greater fluctuation in flow from the set value of 1 ml/hr (p less than 0.02). Variances from mean +/- standard error for each device are shown in parenthesis. IMED 965A (0.005+/-0.014), IVION Kid's Pump (0.002+/-0.009), IVAC 570 (0.001+/-0.006). The Baxter syringe pump (0.002+/-0.009) also had a wide variance in flow. The Baxter OR (0.001+/-0.005) and the Medfusion (0.001+/-0.008) syringe pumps maintained the most consistent flow and showed less variance than the other devices tested.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":80096,"journal":{"name":"Neonatal intensive care : the journal of perinatology-neonatology","volume":"6 3","pages":"20-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatal intensive care : the journal of perinatology-neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Delivery of medications by some infusion devices is irregular. This study investigated instantaneous flow in several infusion devices set at a rate of 1 ml/hr. The following devices were tested: Infusion Pumps: IMED 956A, IVAC 570, IVION "Kids Pump." Syringe Pumps: Medfusion, Baxter, Baxter OR. Tests were performed using a Bio-Tek Infusion Device Analyzer (Model IDA-1). Instantaneous flow rate was defined as Q1/T1 where: Q=sample volume and T=time required to deliver sample volume. The infusion devices were received directly from their respective manufacturers and had not seen clinical service before testing. The units were fully charged and were tested while on AC power. The tests were conducted by the authors, using standard infusion sets and commercially prepared 5% dextrose and 0.45% sodium chloride solution. Each pump was tested for several hours and multiple trials were performed on each pump. The infusion pumps, IMED, IVION, and IVAC all demonstrated deviations from the desired flow rate. The IVAC pump had a greater fluctuation in flow from the set value of 1 ml/hr (p less than 0.02). Variances from mean +/- standard error for each device are shown in parenthesis. IMED 965A (0.005+/-0.014), IVION Kid's Pump (0.002+/-0.009), IVAC 570 (0.001+/-0.006). The Baxter syringe pump (0.002+/-0.009) also had a wide variance in flow. The Baxter OR (0.001+/-0.005) and the Medfusion (0.001+/-0.008) syringe pumps maintained the most consistent flow and showed less variance than the other devices tested.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

1 ml/hr输液器的比较。
一些输液器给药是不规律的。本研究调查了以1ml /hr速率设置的几种输注装置的瞬时流量。测试了以下设备:输液泵:IMED 956A, IVAC 570, IVION“儿童泵”。注射泵:Medfusion, Baxter, Baxter OR。使用Bio-Tek输注设备分析仪(IDA-1型)进行测试。瞬时流量定义为Q1/T1,其中:Q=样品量,T=递送样品量所需时间。这些输液器是直接从各自的制造商那里收到的,在检测之前没有进行过临床服务。这些装置充满电,并在交流电源下进行测试。试验由作者进行,使用标准输液器和市售的5%葡萄糖和0.45%氯化钠溶液。每个泵都测试了几个小时,并对每个泵进行了多次试验。输注泵、IMED、IVION和IVAC均显示出与期望流速的偏差。IVAC泵流量较设定值1 ml/hr波动较大(p < 0.02)。每个设备的平均值+/-标准误差的方差在括号中显示。IMED 965A (0.005+/-0.014), IVION儿童泵(0.002+/-0.009),IVAC 570(0.001+/-0.006)。百特注射泵(0.002+/-0.009)也有很大的流量差异。Baxter OR(0.001+/-0.005)和Medfusion(0.001+/-0.008)注射泵保持最一致的流量,比其他设备显示更小的差异。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信