{"title":"Immediate in situ ESWL as monotherapy in acute obstructive urolithiasis: useful or not?","authors":"L Baert, P Willemen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thirty-two patients with acute obstructive urolithiasis were treated without intervention (stent, nephrostomy tube) within 72 hours after onset of symptoms by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). Relief of obstruction, proven sonographically, was obtained within 48 hours in 78.6% of the patients and 90.6% were stone-free 6 weeks after treatment. Best results were obtained for proximal ureteral stones while the influence of stone volume did not appear to be significant. Whereas our stone-free results for treatment of calculi smaller than 5 mm (92.3%) can be criticized because without treatment these stones may pass spontaneously, a high success rate for larger stones (89.4%) was also noted. These results for in situ ESWL compare favorably to those of ESWL with stent bypass and suggest that ESWL monotherapy should be considered as a noninvasive first line therapy when treating acute obstructive urolithiasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":80212,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of lithotripsy & stone disease","volume":"2 1","pages":"46-8; discussion 49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of lithotripsy & stone disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Thirty-two patients with acute obstructive urolithiasis were treated without intervention (stent, nephrostomy tube) within 72 hours after onset of symptoms by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). Relief of obstruction, proven sonographically, was obtained within 48 hours in 78.6% of the patients and 90.6% were stone-free 6 weeks after treatment. Best results were obtained for proximal ureteral stones while the influence of stone volume did not appear to be significant. Whereas our stone-free results for treatment of calculi smaller than 5 mm (92.3%) can be criticized because without treatment these stones may pass spontaneously, a high success rate for larger stones (89.4%) was also noted. These results for in situ ESWL compare favorably to those of ESWL with stent bypass and suggest that ESWL monotherapy should be considered as a noninvasive first line therapy when treating acute obstructive urolithiasis.