J K Han, B I Choi, Y B Yoon, Y H Park, C W Kim, M C Han
{"title":"Piezoelectric lithotripsy of radiopaque gallstones: results and six-month follow-up.","authors":"J K Han, B I Choi, Y B Yoon, Y H Park, C W Kim, M C Han","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sixty-eight patients with radiopaque gallbladder stones (38 with a single stone, 30 with multiple stones) were treated with piezoelectric extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and results were compared with those of 69 patients with radiolucent stones (28 with a single stone, 41 with multiple stones). Stones were fragmented to 4 mm or less in 76.8% after 41,466 +/- 36,504 shock waves in the radiolucent stone group and 77.9% after 54,686 +/- 51,024 shock waves in the radiopaque stone group (p = 0.876 and 0.130, respectively). In 137 patients, ten patients were lost to follow-up. Average period of follow-up was 220 +/- 198 days. Six-month clearance rate of the radiolucent stone group was 43.5% and that of the radiopaque stone group was 16.4% (p less than 0.05) Figure 1. Six-month clearance rate of patients with single stones smaller than 2 cm was also significantly higher in the radiolucent stone group than in the radiopaque stone group (69.5% vs 18.6%; p less than 0.01). However, in patients with multiple stones, the presence of calcification did not affect rates of successful fragmentation or 6-month clearance. There was no statistically significant difference in incidence of complications between the radiolucent and radiopaque stone groups. Although the number of cases are small and the follow-up period is short, our results of ESWL on radiopaque gallstones are so far not satisfactory in terms of stone clearance. Strict patient selection is needed unless there is an improvement in the lithotripsy procedure or post-lithotripsy management.</p>","PeriodicalId":80218,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of stone disease","volume":"5 2","pages":"89-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of stone disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sixty-eight patients with radiopaque gallbladder stones (38 with a single stone, 30 with multiple stones) were treated with piezoelectric extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and results were compared with those of 69 patients with radiolucent stones (28 with a single stone, 41 with multiple stones). Stones were fragmented to 4 mm or less in 76.8% after 41,466 +/- 36,504 shock waves in the radiolucent stone group and 77.9% after 54,686 +/- 51,024 shock waves in the radiopaque stone group (p = 0.876 and 0.130, respectively). In 137 patients, ten patients were lost to follow-up. Average period of follow-up was 220 +/- 198 days. Six-month clearance rate of the radiolucent stone group was 43.5% and that of the radiopaque stone group was 16.4% (p less than 0.05) Figure 1. Six-month clearance rate of patients with single stones smaller than 2 cm was also significantly higher in the radiolucent stone group than in the radiopaque stone group (69.5% vs 18.6%; p less than 0.01). However, in patients with multiple stones, the presence of calcification did not affect rates of successful fragmentation or 6-month clearance. There was no statistically significant difference in incidence of complications between the radiolucent and radiopaque stone groups. Although the number of cases are small and the follow-up period is short, our results of ESWL on radiopaque gallstones are so far not satisfactory in terms of stone clearance. Strict patient selection is needed unless there is an improvement in the lithotripsy procedure or post-lithotripsy management.