Evaluation of patient controlled sedation and analgesia for ESWL.

The Journal of stone disease Pub Date : 1993-10-01
M Maroof, R M Khan, T H Bhatti, H Hamalawy, M K Siddique
{"title":"Evaluation of patient controlled sedation and analgesia for ESWL.","authors":"M Maroof,&nbsp;R M Khan,&nbsp;T H Bhatti,&nbsp;H Hamalawy,&nbsp;M K Siddique","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was designed to evaluate the quality of sedation/analgesia and patient cooperation provided by Patient Controlled Sedation & Analgesia (PCSA) using propofol and fentanyl (Group II) when compared with anesthetist administered propofol/fentanyl (Group I) in 32 ASA I & II patients undergoing ESWL of renal or ureteric stones. Demographics of the patients and the duration of ESWL were similar in both groups. Dose of propofol/fentanyl used during the procedure was significantly higher in Group I patients as compared to group II (p less than 0.05). Interpatient variability in propofol requirement was reflected in both groups in the lack of significant correlation between propofol dose and procedure duration. PCSA provided a marginally higher degree of patient and surgeon satisfaction scores as compared to anesthetist administered propofol/fentanyl. Quick recovery was more consistent in the PCSA group as compared to group I patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":80218,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of stone disease","volume":"5 4","pages":"240-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of stone disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was designed to evaluate the quality of sedation/analgesia and patient cooperation provided by Patient Controlled Sedation & Analgesia (PCSA) using propofol and fentanyl (Group II) when compared with anesthetist administered propofol/fentanyl (Group I) in 32 ASA I & II patients undergoing ESWL of renal or ureteric stones. Demographics of the patients and the duration of ESWL were similar in both groups. Dose of propofol/fentanyl used during the procedure was significantly higher in Group I patients as compared to group II (p less than 0.05). Interpatient variability in propofol requirement was reflected in both groups in the lack of significant correlation between propofol dose and procedure duration. PCSA provided a marginally higher degree of patient and surgeon satisfaction scores as compared to anesthetist administered propofol/fentanyl. Quick recovery was more consistent in the PCSA group as compared to group I patients.

ESWL患者自控镇静镇痛效果评价。
本研究旨在评价使用丙泊酚和芬太尼(II组)的患者控制镇静镇痛(PCSA)与麻醉师使用丙泊酚/芬太尼(I组)的32例ASA I和II级肾或输尿管结石ESWL患者的镇静/镇痛质量和患者配合情况。两组患者的人口学特征和ESWL持续时间相似。手术过程中使用的异丙酚/芬太尼剂量I组患者明显高于II组(p < 0.05)。两组患者间异丙酚需求量的差异反映在异丙酚剂量和手术时间之间缺乏显著相关性。与麻醉师使用异丙酚/芬太尼相比,PCSA提供了略高程度的患者和外科医生满意度评分。与I组患者相比,PCSA组患者的快速恢复更加一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信